Hi Yunjian,
Thank you for fixing the issue!
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 7:51 AM, wangyunjian <wangyunj...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunj...@huawei.com>
>
> Coverity flags that 'h' variable is used before
> it's checked for NULL. This patch fixes this issue.
>
> Coverity issue: 363625
> Fixes: 769b2de7fb52 ("hash: implement RCU resources reclamation")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunj...@huawei.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> index 7514e33aa9..1191dfd81a 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> @@ -1515,15 +1515,16 @@ rte_hash_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_hash *h, struct
> rte_hash_rcu_config *cfg)
> struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_parameters params = {0};
> char rcu_dq_name[RTE_RCU_QSBR_DQ_NAMESIZE];
> struct rte_hash_rcu_config *hash_rcu_cfg = NULL;
> -const uint32_t total_entries = h->use_local_cache ?
> -h->entries + (RTE_MAX_LCORE - 1) * (LCORE_CACHE_SIZE - 1) + 1
> -: h->entries + 1;
>
> if (h == NULL || cfg == NULL || cfg->v == NULL) {
> rte_errno = EINVAL;
> return 1;
> }
>
> +const uint32_t total_entries = h->use_local_cache ?
> +h->entries + (RTE_MAX_LCORE - 1) * (LCORE_CACHE_SIZE - 1) + 1
> +: h->entries + 1;
> +
> if (h->hash_rcu_cfg) {
> rte_errno = EEXIST;
> return 1;
> —
> 2.23.0
>
Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thak...@arm.com>
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any
medium. Thank you.
