> On Oct 24, 2020, at 4:09 AM, David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:51 AM Dharmik Thakkar
> <dharmik.thak...@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Integrate RCU QSBR to make it easier for the applications to use lock
>> free algorithm.
>>
>> Resource reclamation implementation was split from the original
>> series, and has already been part of RCU library. Rework the series
>> to base hash integration on RCU reclamation APIs.
>>
>> Refer 'Resource reclamation framework for DPDK' available at [1]
>> to understand various aspects of integrating RCU library
>> into other libraries.
>>
>> [1] https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/rcu_lib.html
>>
>> Introduce a new API rte_hash_rcu_qsbr_add for application to
>> register a RCU variable that hash library will use.
>>
>> Functional tests and performance tests are added to cover the
>> integration with RCU.
>
> Fixed some style issues/checkpatch warnings.
> The unit test code especially is not really checkpatch compliant,
> maybe worth a separate cleanup later.
>
> Removed unrelated changes (like removing empty lines, fixing typos in
> unrelated parts).
>
> Series applied, thanks.
>
>
> Little note: checkpatch now has a check on repeated words better than
> a script of mine:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/scripts/checkpatch.pl?id=1a3dcf2e6b35faa1176b9cd8200094fbce16ba19
> Probably worth it for people to update their checkpatch.pl.
>
Thank you, David! Appreciate your help.
>
> --
> David Marchand
