On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:21 AM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > The example used the deprecated mbuf field udata64. > It is moved to a dynamic field in order to allow removal of udata64. > > Note: RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD_TIMESTAMP_NAME is an existing mbuf field name.
I am a bit lost. How is this going to work as the mbuf timestamp field is used in this example too? -- David Marchand
