On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 8:13 AM Rong, Leyi <leyi.r...@intel.com> wrote:
> Would prefer using __AVX512F__ instead of RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_AVX512F here
> rather than remove the RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_ macro directly to check the CPU
> capability.
> So the judgment statement will be
> if cc.get_define('__AVX512F__', args: machine_args) != '' or (not
> machine_args.contains('-mno-avx512f') and cc.has_argument('-mavx512f'))
>
> what do you think?
No opinion as I have yet to understand the subtleties to control
enablement of avx stuff.
Bruce?
--
David Marchand
