On 10/21/2020 7:00 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
Fix a potential resource leak in case of errors during dev args
parsing during device probe.
Fixes: 6dc83230b43b ("net/bnxt: support port representor data path")
Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.pura...@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
index 562cf14ba..aa2d9e00e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
@@ -6285,7 +6285,7 @@ static int bnxt_rep_port_probe(struct rte_pci_device
*pci_dev,
struct bnxt *backing_bp;
uint16_t num_rep;
int i, ret = 0;
- struct rte_kvargs *kvlist;
+ struct rte_kvargs *kvlist = NULL;
num_rep = eth_da.nb_representor_ports;
if (num_rep > BNXT_MAX_VF_REPS) {
@@ -6339,49 +6339,79 @@ static int bnxt_rep_port_probe(struct rte_pci_device
*pci_dev,
* Invoked as for ex: "-w 000:00:0d.0,
* rep-based-pf=<pf index> rep-is-pf=<VF=0 or PF=1>"
*/
+ ret =
rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, BNXT_DEVARG_REP_IS_PF,
bnxt_parse_devarg_rep_is_pf,
(void *)&representor);
Hi Ajit,
This is a different syntax, seems repeated a few times below, is it auto
generated?
Can it be possible to merge the assignment line with the call?