On 10/21/2020 7:00 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
Fix a potential resource leak in case of errors during dev args
parsing during device probe.

Fixes: 6dc83230b43b ("net/bnxt: support port representor data path")

Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.pura...@broadcom.com>
---
  drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
index 562cf14ba..aa2d9e00e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
@@ -6285,7 +6285,7 @@ static int bnxt_rep_port_probe(struct rte_pci_device 
*pci_dev,
        struct bnxt *backing_bp;
        uint16_t num_rep;
        int i, ret = 0;
-       struct rte_kvargs *kvlist;
+       struct rte_kvargs *kvlist = NULL;
num_rep = eth_da.nb_representor_ports;
        if (num_rep > BNXT_MAX_VF_REPS) {
@@ -6339,49 +6339,79 @@ static int bnxt_rep_port_probe(struct rte_pci_device 
*pci_dev,
                         * Invoked as for ex: "-w 000:00:0d.0,
                         * rep-based-pf=<pf index> rep-is-pf=<VF=0 or PF=1>"
                         */
+                       ret =
                        rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, BNXT_DEVARG_REP_IS_PF,
                                           bnxt_parse_devarg_rep_is_pf,
                                           (void *)&representor);

Hi Ajit,

This is a different syntax, seems repeated a few times below, is it auto 
generated?
Can it be possible to merge the assignment line with the call?

Reply via email to