On 12-Oct-20 9:11 AM, Nithin Dabilpuram wrote:
Add test case in test_memory to test VFIO DMA map/unmap.

Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpu...@marvell.com>
---
  app/test/test_memory.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)

diff --git a/app/test/test_memory.c b/app/test/test_memory.c
index 7d5ae99..1c56455 100644
--- a/app/test/test_memory.c
+++ b/app/test/test_memory.c
@@ -4,11 +4,16 @@
#include <stdio.h>
  #include <stdint.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <rte_eal.h>
+#include <rte_errno.h>
  #include <rte_memory.h>
  #include <rte_common.h>
  #include <rte_memzone.h>
+#include <rte_vfio.h>
#include "test.h" @@ -70,6 +75,71 @@ check_seg_fds(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl, const struct rte_memseg *ms,
  }
static int
+test_memory_vfio_dma_map(void)
+{
+       uint64_t sz = 2 * sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE), sz1, sz2;

i think we now have a function for that, rte_page_size() ?

Also, i would prefer

uint64_t sz1, sz2, sz = 2 * rte_page_size();

Easier to parse IMO.

+       uint64_t unmap1, unmap2;
+       uint8_t *mem;
+       int ret;
+
+       /* Check if vfio is enabled in both kernel and eal */
+       ret = rte_vfio_is_enabled("vfio");
+       if (!ret)
+               return 1;

No need, rte_vfio_container_dma_map() should set errno to ENODEV if vfio is not enabled.

+
+       /* Allocate twice size of page */
+       mem = mmap(NULL, sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
+                  MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
+       if (mem == MAP_FAILED) {
+               printf("Failed to allocate memory for external heap\n");
+               return -1;
+       }
+
+       /* Force page allocation */
+       memset(mem, 0, sz);
+
+       /* map the whole region */
+       ret = rte_vfio_container_dma_map(RTE_VFIO_DEFAULT_CONTAINER_FD,
+                                        (uint64_t)mem, (rte_iova_t)mem, sz);

should be (uintptr_t) perhaps?

Also, this can return -1 with rte_errno == ENOTSUP, i think this happens if there are no devices attached (or if there's no VFIO support, like it would be on FreeBSD or Windows).

+       if (ret) {
+               printf("Failed to dma map whole region, ret=%d\n", ret);
+               goto fail;
+       }
+
+       unmap1 = (uint64_t)mem + (sz / 2);
+       sz1 = sz / 2;
+       unmap2 = (uint64_t)mem;
+       sz2 = sz / 2;
+       /* unmap the partial region */
+       ret = rte_vfio_container_dma_unmap(RTE_VFIO_DEFAULT_CONTAINER_FD,
+                                          unmap1, (rte_iova_t)unmap1, sz1);
+       if (ret) {
+               if (rte_errno == ENOTSUP) {
+                       printf("Partial dma unmap not supported\n");
+                       unmap2 = (uint64_t)mem;
+                       sz2 = sz;
+               } else {
+                       printf("Failed to unmap send half region, ret=%d(%d)\n",

I think "send half" is a typo? Also, here and in other places, i would prefer a rte_strerror() instead of raw rte_errno number.

+                              ret, rte_errno);
+                       goto fail;
+               }
+       }
+
+       /* unmap the remaining region */
+       ret = rte_vfio_container_dma_unmap(RTE_VFIO_DEFAULT_CONTAINER_FD,
+                                          unmap2, (rte_iova_t)unmap2, sz2);
+       if (ret) {
+               printf("Failed to unmap remaining region, ret=%d(%d)\n", ret,
+                      rte_errno);
+               goto fail;
+       }
+
+fail:
+       munmap(mem, sz);
+       return ret;
+}
+
+static int
  test_memory(void)
  {
        uint64_t s;
@@ -101,6 +171,15 @@ test_memory(void)
                return -1;
        }
+ /* test for vfio dma map/unmap */
+       ret = test_memory_vfio_dma_map();
+       if (ret == 1) {
+               printf("VFIO dma map/unmap unsupported\n");
+       } else if (ret < 0) {
+               printf("Error vfio dma map/unmap, ret=%d\n", ret);
+               return -1;
+       }
+

This looks odd in this autotest. Perhaps create a new autotest for VFIO?

        return 0;
  }


--
Thanks,
Anatoly

Reply via email to