> -----Original Message-----
> From: Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
> Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2020 12:02 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ma, Liang J <liang.j...@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>;
> Guo, Jia <jia....@intel.com>; Hunt, David <david.h...@intel.com>;
> Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>;
> jerinjac...@gmail.com; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>;
> tho...@monjalon.net; McDaniel, Timothy <timothy.mcdan...@intel.com>;
> Eads, Gage <gage.e...@intel.com>; Macnamara, Chris
> <chris.macnam...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v5 07/10] net/i40e: implement power management API
> 
> From: Liang Ma <liang.j...@intel.com>
> 
> Implement support for the power management API by implementing a
> `get_wake_addr` function that will return an address of an RX ring's status 
> bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liang Ma <liang.j...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c |  1 +
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c   | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h   |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index 943cfe71dc..cab86f8ec9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops i40e_eth_dev_ops = {
>       .mtu_set                      = i40e_dev_mtu_set,
>       .tm_ops_get                   = i40e_tm_ops_get,
>       .tx_done_cleanup              = i40e_tx_done_cleanup,
> +     .get_wake_addr                = i40e_get_wake_addr,
>  };
> 
>  /* store statistics names and its offset in stats structure */ diff --git
> a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
> 322fc1ed75..c17f27292f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,29 @@
>  #define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \
>               (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
> 
> +int
> +i40e_get_wake_addr(void *rx_queue, volatile void **tail_desc_addr,
> +             uint64_t *expected, uint64_t *mask)
> +{
> +     struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq = rx_queue;
> +     volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp;
> +     uint16_t desc;
> +
> +     desc = rxq->rx_tail;
> +     rxdp = &rxq->rx_ring[desc];
> +     /* watch for changes in status bit */
> +     *tail_desc_addr = &rxdp->wb.qword1.status_error_len;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * we expect the DD bit to be set to 1 if this descriptor was already
> +      * written to.
> +      */
> +     *expected = rte_cpu_to_le_64(1 <<
> I40E_RX_DESC_STATUS_DD_SHIFT);
> +     *mask = rte_cpu_to_le_64(1 << I40E_RX_DESC_STATUS_DD_SHIFT);
> +
> +     return 0;

Suppose that it will always success to get wake addr in i40e, right?

> +}
> +
>  static inline void
>  i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union i40e_rx_desc
> *rxdp)  { diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h index 57d7b4160b..f23a2073e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> @@ -248,6 +248,8 @@ uint16_t i40e_recv_scattered_pkts_vec_avx2(void
> *rx_queue,
>       struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts);  uint16_t
> i40e_xmit_pkts_vec_avx2(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
>       uint16_t nb_pkts);
> +int i40e_get_wake_addr(void *rx_queue, volatile void **tail_desc_addr,
> +             uint64_t *expected, uint64_t *value);
> 
>  /* For each value it means, datasheet of hardware can tell more details
>   *
> --
> 2.17.1

Reply via email to