On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:58 PM Carrillo, Erik G <erik.g.carri...@intel.com> wrote: > > Since we go with documenting a limitation, should we mark the original > > patches [1] and [2] as rejected instead of deferred? > > > > 1: https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/75156/ > > 2: https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/73683/ > > > > > Thanks, David. > > Yes, those patches should be moved to "rejected" - I tried to do it myself, > but got permission errors. Sarosh, can you make these updates?
I updated them. Thanks Erik. -- David Marchand
