Currently, the interrupt status notification prevents log spam by
remembering whether previous interrupt wakeup was due to traffic or due
to timeout expiring. However, it is a single variable that can
potentially be accessed from multiple threads, so it is not thread-safe.

Fix it by having per-lcore interrupt status.

Fixes: f4d1e19c293d ("examples/l3fwd-power: add Rx interrupt timeout")
Cc: anatoly.bura...@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
---

Notes:
    v2:
    - Fix confusing variable naming

 examples/l3fwd-power/main.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c b/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c
index d0e6c9bd77..526af0db29 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c
+++ b/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c
@@ -821,20 +821,23 @@ power_freq_scaleup_heuristic(unsigned lcore_id,
  *  0 on success
  */
 static int
-sleep_until_rx_interrupt(int num)
+sleep_until_rx_interrupt(int num, int lcore)
 {
        /*
         * we want to track when we are woken up by traffic so that we can go
-        * back to sleep again without log spamming.
+        * back to sleep again without log spamming. Avoid cache line sharing
+        * to prevent threads stepping on each others' toes.
         */
-       static bool timeout;
+       static struct {
+               bool wakeup;
+       } __rte_cache_aligned status[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
        struct rte_epoll_event event[num];
        int n, i;
        uint16_t port_id;
        uint8_t queue_id;
        void *data;
 
-       if (!timeout) {
+       if (status[lcore].wakeup) {
                RTE_LOG(INFO, L3FWD_POWER,
                                "lcore %u sleeps until interrupt triggers\n",
                                rte_lcore_id());
@@ -851,7 +854,7 @@ sleep_until_rx_interrupt(int num)
                        " port %d queue %d\n",
                        rte_lcore_id(), port_id, queue_id);
        }
-       timeout = n == 0;
+       status[lcore].wakeup = n != 0;
 
        return 0;
 }
@@ -1050,7 +1053,8 @@ static int main_intr_loop(__rte_unused void *dummy)
                                if (intr_en) {
                                        turn_on_off_intr(qconf, 1);
                                        sleep_until_rx_interrupt(
-                                                       qconf->n_rx_queue);
+                                                       qconf->n_rx_queue,
+                                                       lcore_id);
                                        turn_on_off_intr(qconf, 0);
                                        /**
                                         * start receiving packets immediately
@@ -1473,7 +1477,8 @@ main_legacy_loop(__rte_unused void *dummy)
                                if (intr_en) {
                                        turn_on_off_intr(qconf, 1);
                                        sleep_until_rx_interrupt(
-                                               qconf->n_rx_queue);
+                                                       qconf->n_rx_queue,
+                                                       lcore_id);
                                        turn_on_off_intr(qconf, 0);
                                        /**
                                         * start receiving packets immediately
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to