Hi Akhil,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 8:18 PM
> To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>; Doherty, Declan 
> <declan.dohe...@intel.com>;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Trahe, Fiona <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; ano...@marvell.com; 
> shal...@marvell.com; Zhang, Roy Fan
> <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] [RFC] cryptodev: move AES-GMAC to aead algorithms
> 
> Hi Arek,
> 
> >
> > Hi Akhil,
> >
> > @Akhil: Is there a chance getting this change into 20.11?
> >
> > Any more comments or anyone see any potential issues with this approach?
> >
> 
> I am ok to take this patch in 20.11 release. Could you please send a new 
> version
> With complete patch, removing all references of RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_AES_GMAC.
> 
> Please explain in the release notes and deprecation notice as well.
We're ok to live with it as is and don’t plan to send a patch at this time.



> 
> 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] cryptodev: move AES-GMAC to aead algorithms
> >
> > On 29/07/2020 3:22 PM, Arek Kusztal wrote:
> > > This is proposal to move AES-GMAC algorithm to AEAD set of algorithms.
> > > It is however not 100% conformant GMAC as instead of aad pointer data
> > > to be authenticated is passed normally and  aead.data.length field is
> > > used to specify length of data to be authenticated.
> > > Reason behind this move is that GMAC is variant of GCM so it may
> > > simplify implementations that are using these algorithms (mainly IPsec).
> > > AES-GMAC therefore needs to be removed from auth algorithms.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > ..
> > >
> >
> > I think  this makes sense in light of how AES-GMAC support is specified in 
> > the
> > IPsec GMAC rfc
> > (https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.iet
> > f.org%2Fhtml%2Frfc4543&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cakhil.goyal%40nxp.com%7Cf
> > 0aec031674e4832272108d838f7e961%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635
> > %7C0%7C0%7C637321984712376305&amp;sdata=OgaLnAqcAGg1xzD8QfSWn%
> > 2F9Qa8vOkqEiZutDZcz5JLo%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> >
> > Acked-by: Declan Doherty <declan.dohe...@intel.com>

Reply via email to