On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 3:25 PM Sunil Kumar Kori <sk...@marvell.com> wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Timothy McDaniel > >Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:28 PM > >Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>; > >mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com; liang.j...@intel.com; > >peter.mccar...@intel.com; nipun.gu...@nxp.com; Pavan Nikhilesh > >Bhagavatula <pbhagavat...@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org; > >erik.g.carri...@intel.com; gage.e...@intel.com; harry.van.haa...@intel.com; > >hemant.agra...@nxp.com; bruce.richard...@intel.com > >Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eventdev: implement ABI change
Please change subject to "eventdev: express DLB PMD constraints" or something similar. > > > >This commit implements the eventdev ABI changes required by the DLB PMD. > > > >The DLB hardware does not conform exactly to the eventdev interface. > >1) It has a limit on the number of queues that may be linked to a port. > >2) Some ports are further restricted to a maximum of 1 linked queue. > >3) It does not (currently) have the ability to carry the flow_id as part of > >the > >event (QE) payload. > > > >Due to the above, we would like to propose the following enhancements. > > > >1) Add new fields to the rte_event_dev_info struct. These fields allow the > >device to advertise its capabilities so that applications can take the > >appropriate actions based on those capabilities. > > > >2) Add a new field to the rte_event_dev_config struct. This field allows the > >application to specify how many of its ports are limited to a single link, > >or will > >be used in single link mode. > > > >3) Replace the dedicated implicit_release_disabled field with a bit field of > >explicit port capabilities. The implicit_release_disable functionality is > >assigned > >to one bit, and a port-is-single-link-only attribute is assigned to another, > >with > >the remaining bits available for future assignment. > > > >Signed-off-by: Timothy McDaniel <timothy.mcdan...@intel.com> > >--- > > drivers/event/dpaa/dpaa_eventdev.c | 3 +- > > drivers/event/dpaa2/dpaa2_eventdev.c | 5 +- > > drivers/event/dsw/dsw_evdev.c | 3 +- > > drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_evdev.c | 5 +- > > drivers/event/octeontx2/otx2_evdev.c | 3 +- > > drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c | 3 +- > > drivers/event/skeleton/skeleton_eventdev.c | 5 +- > > drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.c | 8 ++-- > > drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_selftest.c | 6 +-- > > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_eth_tx_adapter.c | 2 +- > > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c | 66 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++---- > > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd_pci.h | 1 - > > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_trace.h | 7 +-- > > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map | 4 +- Missed to remove the announced depreciation notice. > > 15 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > > > /** > > * @internal > > * Wrapper for use by pci drivers as a .remove function to detach a event > > diff > >--git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_trace.h > >b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_trace.h > >index 4de6341..5ec43d8 100644 > >--- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_trace.h > >+++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_trace.h > >@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ RTE_TRACE_POINT( > > rte_trace_point_emit_u32(dev_conf- > >>nb_event_port_dequeue_depth); > > rte_trace_point_emit_u32(dev_conf- > >>nb_event_port_enqueue_depth); > > rte_trace_point_emit_u32(dev_conf->event_dev_cfg); > >+ rte_trace_point_emit_u8(dev_conf- > >>nb_single_link_event_port_queues); > > rte_trace_point_emit_int(rc); > > ) > > > I tried running testpmd with trace support with this patch and got following > error: > > EAL: __rte_trace_point_emit_field():442 CTF field is too long > EAL: __rte_trace_point_register():468 missing rte_trace_emit_header() in > register fn > > It is because of memory (384 bytes) for CTF gets exhausted during > eventdev_configure. > Did you also observe the same issue ? If yes, Then please send a separate > patch to increase > Maximum buffer size TRACE_CTF_FIELD_SIZE. Recommended size is 448 bytes. Please check this and send the next version for this and common code change[1]. I would like to merge-common code change first and then the DLB drivers. [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/77466/ > > >@@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ RTE_TRACE_POINT( > > rte_trace_point_emit_i32(port_conf->new_event_threshold); > > rte_trace_point_emit_u16(port_conf->dequeue_depth); > > rte_trace_point_emit_u16(port_conf->enqueue_depth); > >- rte_trace_point_emit_u8(port_conf->disable_implicit_release); > >+ rte_trace_point_emit_u32(port_conf->event_port_cfg); > > rte_trace_point_emit_int(rc); > > ) > > > >@@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ RTE_TRACE_POINT( > > rte_trace_point_emit_i32(port_conf->new_event_threshold); > > rte_trace_point_emit_u16(port_conf->dequeue_depth); > > rte_trace_point_emit_u16(port_conf->enqueue_depth); > >- rte_trace_point_emit_u8(port_conf->disable_implicit_release); > >+ rte_trace_point_emit_u32(port_conf->event_port_cfg); > > rte_trace_point_emit_ptr(conf_cb); > > rte_trace_point_emit_int(rc); > > ) > >@@ -257,7 +258,7 @@ RTE_TRACE_POINT( > > rte_trace_point_emit_i32(port_conf->new_event_threshold); > > rte_trace_point_emit_u16(port_conf->dequeue_depth); > > rte_trace_point_emit_u16(port_conf->enqueue_depth); > >- rte_trace_point_emit_u8(port_conf->disable_implicit_release); > >+ rte_trace_point_emit_u32(port_conf->event_port_cfg); > > ) > > > > RTE_TRACE_POINT( > >diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map > >b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map > >index 3d9d0ca..2846d04 100644 > >--- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map > >+++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map > >@@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { > > # added in 20.05 > > __rte_eventdev_trace_configure; > > __rte_eventdev_trace_queue_setup; > >- __rte_eventdev_trace_port_setup; > > __rte_eventdev_trace_port_link; > > __rte_eventdev_trace_port_unlink; > > __rte_eventdev_trace_start; > >@@ -134,4 +133,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { > > __rte_eventdev_trace_crypto_adapter_queue_pair_del; > > __rte_eventdev_trace_crypto_adapter_start; > > __rte_eventdev_trace_crypto_adapter_stop; > >+ > >+ # changed in 20.11 > >+ __rte_eventdev_trace_port_setup; + Ray, Techboard Trace is still experimental. So I assume we don't need any depreciation notice to change this. > > }; > >-- > >2.6.4 >