Hi Thomas,

Ipn3ke is based on ifpga_bus, and all ethdevs created from ipn3ke are 
representors.
So it's no need to add RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE flags into ipn3ke driver.

Thanks,
Rosen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 6:16
> To: John W. Linville <linvi...@tuxdriver.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Shepard Siegel <shepard.sie...@atomicrules.com>;
> Ed Czeck <ed.cz...@atomicrules.com>; John Miller
> <john.mil...@atomicrules.com>; Igor Russkikh
> <igor.russk...@aquantia.com>; Pavel Belous <pavel.bel...@aquantia.com>;
> Matt Peters <matt.pet...@windriver.com>; Rasesh Mody
> <rm...@marvell.com>; Shahed Shaikh <shsha...@marvell.com>; Ajit
> Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>; Somnath Kotur
> <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com>; Chas Williams <ch...@att.com>; Rahul
> Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkire...@chelsio.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Marcin Wojtas <m...@semihalf.com>; Michal
> Krawczyk <m...@semihalf.com>; Guy Tzalik <gtza...@amazon.com>; Evgeny
> Schemeilin <evge...@amazon.com>; Gagandeep Singh <g.si...@nxp.com>;
> John Daley <johnd...@cisco.com>; Hyong Youb Kim <hyon...@cisco.com>;
> Gaetan Rivet <gr...@u256.net>; Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.w...@intel.com>;
> Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh
> <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Shijith Thotton <sthot...@marvell.com>;
> Srisivasubramanian Srinivasan <sriniva...@marvell.com>; Matan Azrad
> <ma...@mellanox.com>; Shahaf Shuler <shah...@mellanox.com>; Zyta
> Szpak <z...@semihalf.com>; Liron Himi <lir...@marvell.com>; Stephen
> Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>; K. Y. Srinivasan
> <k...@microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang <haiya...@microsoft.com>; Jerin
> Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; Andrew Rybchenko
> <arybche...@solarflare.com>; Singh, Jasvinder
> <jasvinder.si...@intel.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; Wiles, Keith <keith.wi...@intel.com>;
> Maciej Czekaj <mcze...@marvell.com>; Maxime Coquelin
> <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>; Wang, Zhihong
> <zhihong.w...@intel.com>; Yong Wang <yongw...@vmware.com>;
> Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com>;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xu, Rosen <rosen...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Loftus, Ciara
> <ciara.lof...@intel.com>; Steven Webster <steven.webs...@windriver.com>;
> Somalapuram Amaranath <asoma...@amd.com>;
> xavier.hu...@huawei.com; Sachin Saxena <sachin.sax...@nxp.com>;
> Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; Guo, Jia <jia....@intel.com>; Igor
> Chauskin <igo...@amazon.com>; Ziyang Xuan <xuanziya...@huawei.com>;
> Xiaoyun Wang <cloud.wangxiao...@huawei.com>; Guoyang Zhou
> <zhouguoy...@huawei.com>; Min Hu (Connor) <humi...@huawei.com>;
> Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhu...@huawei.com>; Alfredo Cardigliano
> <cardigli...@ntop.org>; Jakub Grajciar <jgraj...@cisco.com>; Viacheslav
> Ovsiienko <viachesl...@mellanox.com>; Long Li <lon...@microsoft.com>;
> Martin Spinler <spin...@cesnet.cz>; Heinrich Kuhn
> <heinrich.k...@netronome.com>; Harman Kalra <hka...@marvell.com>;
> Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpu...@marvell.com>; Kiran Kumar K
> <kirankum...@marvell.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; Yigit,
> Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of
> port
> 
> The patches for removing RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE are sent:
>       https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=12173
> 
> 11 drivers are not supporting the new behaviour correctly:
>       bnx2x, cxgbe, dpaa, dpaa2, enetc, ionic,
>       ipn3ke, liquidio, nfp, pfe, qede
> 
> If you are the maintainer of one of these drivers, you can still consider 
> fixing
> it in the next days.
> 
> 
> 12/09/2020 13:25, Thomas Monjalon:
> > 03/08/2020 20:50, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > 18/04/2019 12:59, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Since DPDK 18.11, the behaviour of the close operation is changed
> > > > if RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE is enabled in the driver:
> > > > port is released (i.e. totally freed and data erased) on close.
> > > > This new behaviour is enabled per driver for a migration period.
> > > >
> > > > Looking at the code, you can see these comments:
> > > > /* old behaviour: only free queue arrays */ RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(DEBUG,
> > > > "Port closing is using an old behaviour.\n"
> > > >         "The driver %s should migrate to the new behaviour.\n",
> > > > /* new behaviour: send event + reset state + free all data */
> > > >
> > > > You can find an advice in the commit:
> > > >         http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=23ea57a2a
> > > > "
> > > > When enabling RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE, the PMD must free all
> its
> > > > private resources for the port, in its dev_close function.
> > > > It is advised to call the dev_close function in the remove
> > > > function in order to support removing a device without closing its 
> > > > ports.
> > > > "
> > > >
> > > > It would be great to complete this migration for the next LTS
> > > > version, which will be 19.11.
> > >
> > > For the record, it did not happen in 19.11.
> > >
> > > > Following drivers should be migrated:
> > > > ( find drivers/net -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d | cut -d/ -f3 ;
> > > > git grep -l RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE drivers | cut -d/ -f3 ) |
> > > > sort | uniq -u
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > The progress in April 2019 was 4 of 46 (9%).
> > >
> > > > Please let's progress smoothly on this topic, thanks.
> > >
> > > More than one year later, the progress is 26 of 53 (49%).
> > >
> > > > The concerned maintainers (Cc) can be found with the following
> command:
> > > > devtools/get-maintainer.sh $(( find drivers/net -mindepth 1
> > > > -maxdepth 1 -type d | cut -d/ -f-3 ; git grep -l
> > > > RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE drivers ) | sort | uniq -u)
> > >
> > > We cannot wait forever. Temporary cannot be longer than 2 years.
> > > I am going to send a deprecation notice to remove the "temporary"
> > > flag RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE.
> >
> > The deprecation notice was merged in 20.08:
> >     http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-August/177314.html
> >
> > > It will break drivers which are not migrated.
> > > It will probably help to find motivation in new priorities.
> > >
> > > More details on what to do can be found in this mail thread:
> > >   http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/1748144.UFpUr2FPnr@xps/
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > * The freeing of private port resources must be moved in the PMD from
> > the ".remove(device)" function to the ".dev_close(port)" function.
> >
> > * If a generic resource (.mac_addrs or .hash_mac_addrs) cannot be
> > freed, it must be set to NULL in ".dev_close" PMD function to protect
> > from subsequent rte_eth_dev_release_port() freeing.
> >
> > * Note 1:
> > The generic resources are freed in rte_eth_dev_release_port(), after
> > ".dev_close" is called in rte_eth_dev_close(), but not when calling
> > ".dev_close" directly from the ".remove" PMD function.
> > That's why rte_eth_dev_release_port() must still be called explicitly
> > from ".remove(device)" after calling the ".dev_close" PMD function.
> >
> > * Note 2:
> > If a device can have multiple ports, the common resources must be
> > freed only in the ".remove(device)" function.
> >
> > * Note 3:
> > The port is supposed to be in a stopped state when it is closed.
> > If it is not the case, it is free to the PMD implementation how to
> > react when trying to close a non-stopped port:
> > either try to stop it automatically or just return an error.
> 
> 

Reply via email to