On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:42:07 +0100 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 9/15/2020 3:03 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Vdev_netvsc has been around for several years. It no longer needs > > to be marked experimental. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 3b16d7a4b8c8..32db0996181f 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ F: buildtools/options-ibverbs-static.sh > > F: doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst > > F: doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini > > > > -Microsoft vdev_netvsc - EXPERIMENTAL > > +Microsoft vdev_netvsc > > M: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com> > > F: drivers/net/vdev_netvsc/ > > F: doc/guides/nics/vdev_netvsc.rst > > > > As far as I remember 'vdev_netvsc' was interim solution until 'netvsc' > was ready. In this patchset 'netvsc' is also becoming mature. > > Wouldn't be easier to keep 'vdev_netvsc' experimental to be able to > remove it soon? Let me discuss with Long Li and management. Maybe replace EXPERIMENTAL with DEPRECATED in 20.11.
