Hi > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Rapelly, Varun > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 9:07 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] ACL trie insertion and search > > Hi, > > We were converting the acl rule data, from host to network byte order, [by > mistake] while inserting into trie. And while searching we > are not converting the search data to n/w byte order. > With the above also rules are matching, except few scenarios. > > After correcting the above mistake, all rules are matching perfectly fine. > > I believe the above[converting while insertion] should also work for all > rules. Please clarify the above.
Yes, that's correct. rte_acl_add_rules() expects all fields to be in host byte order, while rte_acl_classify()expects all fields in input data buffers to be in network byte order. As mentioned in comments in rte_acl.h. Konstantin > > Regards, > Varun
