On 21/08/2020 16:28, Kinsella, Ray wrote:
>
>
> On 20/08/2020 15:32, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 25/06/2020 10:59, alangordonde...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Alan Dewar <alan.de...@att.com>
>>>
>>> The QoS scheduler works off port time that is computed from the number
>>> of CPU cycles that have elapsed since the last time the port was
>>> polled. It divides the number of elapsed cycles to calculate how
>>> many bytes can be sent, however this division can generate rounding
>>> errors, where some fraction of a byte sent may be lost.
>>>
>>> Lose enough of these fractional bytes and the QoS scheduler
>>> underperforms. The problem is worse with low bandwidths.
>>>
>>> To compensate for this rounding error this fix doesn't advance the
>>> port's time_cpu_cycles by the number of cycles that have elapsed,
>>> but by multiplying the computed number of bytes that can be sent
>>> (which has been rounded down) by number of cycles per byte.
>>> This will mean that port's time_cpu_cycles will lag behind the CPU
>>> cycles momentarily. At the next poll, the lag will be taken into
>>> account.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> If the cycles value wraps (100 year+) reset the port's cpu cycle back
>>> to zero.
>>>
>>> Fixes: de3cfa2c98 ("sched: initial import")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Dewar <alan.de...@att.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c | 11 +++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c b/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c
>>> index c0983ddda..7c022cd61 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c
>>> @@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ struct rte_sched_port {
>>> uint64_t time_cpu_bytes; /* Current CPU time measured in bytes */
>>> uint64_t time; /* Current NIC TX time measured in bytes
>>> */
>>> struct rte_reciprocal inv_cycles_per_byte; /* CPU cycles per byte */
>>> + uint64_t cycles_per_byte;
>>>
>>
>> I was backporting this patch to 18.11. The older ABI checker complains
>> about this structure change.
>>
>> "cycles_per_byte has been added at the middle position of this
>> structural type."
>>
>> Isn't this an ABI break? Dropping from 18.11 for time being.
>
> So it looks like rte_sched_port * is an opaque pointers as it's contents are
> only
> known to rte_sched.c and not outside. To everyone else it is an opaque data
> structure,
> so structural changes to it would not be an ABI breakage.
>
Thanks Ray, makes sense. I've included the fix in 18.11.10-rc1.
Kevin.
>>
>>> /* Grinders */
>>> struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out;
>>> @@ -852,6 +853,7 @@ rte_sched_port_config(struct rte_sched_port_params
>>> *params)
>>> cycles_per_byte = (rte_get_tsc_hz() << RTE_SCHED_TIME_SHIFT)
>>> / params->rate;
>>> port->inv_cycles_per_byte = rte_reciprocal_value(cycles_per_byte);
>>> + port->cycles_per_byte = cycles_per_byte;
>>>
>>> /* Grinders */
>>> port->pkts_out = NULL;
>>> @@ -2673,16 +2675,21 @@ static inline void
>>> rte_sched_port_time_resync(struct rte_sched_port *port)
>>> {
>>> uint64_t cycles = rte_get_tsc_cycles();
>>> - uint64_t cycles_diff = cycles - port->time_cpu_cycles;
>>> + uint64_t cycles_diff;
>>> uint64_t bytes_diff;
>>> uint32_t i;
>>>
>>> + if (cycles < port->time_cpu_cycles)
>>> + port->time_cpu_cycles = 0;
>>> +
>>> + cycles_diff = cycles - port->time_cpu_cycles;
>>> /* Compute elapsed time in bytes */
>>> bytes_diff = rte_reciprocal_divide(cycles_diff << RTE_SCHED_TIME_SHIFT,
>>> port->inv_cycles_per_byte);
>>>
>>> /* Advance port time */
>>> - port->time_cpu_cycles = cycles;
>>> + port->time_cpu_cycles +=
>>> + (bytes_diff * port->cycles_per_byte) >> RTE_SCHED_TIME_SHIFT;
>>> port->time_cpu_bytes += bytes_diff;
>>> if (port->time < port->time_cpu_bytes)
>>> port->time = port->time_cpu_bytes;
>>>
>>
>
