03/09/2020 22:59, Michael Baum: > I think the names of the patches describe well enough > and there is no need to add a description in the cover-letter.
An introduction giving the general idea, explaining the reason for writing these changes, is always appreciable. PS: Please do not top-post. > From: Tom Barbette <barbe...@kth.se> > > Could you provide a cover letter? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tom > > > > Le 03/09/2020 à 12:13, Michael Baum a écrit : > > > v1: > > > Initial version > > > > > > Michael Baum (18): > > > net/mlx5: fix Rx hash queue creation error flow > > > net/mlx5: fix Rx queue state update > > > net/mlx5: fix types differentiation in Rxq create > > > net/mlx5: mitigate Rx queue reference counters > > > net/mlx5: separate Rx queue object creations > > > net/mlx5: separate Rx interrupt handling > > > net/mlx5: share Rx control code > > > net/mlx5: rearrange the creation of RQ and CQ resources > > > net/mlx5: rearrange the creation of WQ and CQ object > > > net/mlx5: separate Rx queue object modification > > > net/mlx5: share Rx queue object modification > > > net/mlx5: separate Rx indirection table object creation > > > net/mlx5: separate Rx hash queue creation > > > net/mlx5: remove indirection table type field > > > net/mlx5: share Rx queue indirection table code > > > net/mlx5: share Rx hash queue code > > > net/mlx5: separate Rx queue drop > > > net/mlx5: share Rx queue drop action code
