Yes, that sounds good. What do you think of having the command to be "show
port (port_id|all) (module_eeprom|eeprom)"?
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:00 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 9/1/2020 8:07 PM, David Liu wrote:
> > Change display message.
> > Add EEPROM dump command
> > "show port <port_id> eeprom"
> > Add module EEPROM dump command
> > "show port <port_id> module_eeprom"
> > Commands will dump the content of the
> > EEPROM/module EEPROM for the selected port.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Liu <d...@iol.unh.edu>
> > ---
> > app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 87 ++++++++++++++
> > app/test-pmd/config.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 2 +
> > doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 14 +++
> > 4 files changed, 229 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > index a037a55c6..71c98dd96 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > @@ -166,6 +166,12 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void
> *parsed_result,
> > "show port
> (info|stats|summary|xstats|fdir|stat_qmap|dcb_tc|cap) (port_id|all)\n"
> > " Display information for port_id, or all.\n\n"
> >
> > + "show port (port_id) eeprom \n"
> > + " Display the EEPROM infomation for given
> port_id.\n\n"
> > +
> > + "show port (port_id) module_eeprom \n"
> > + " Display the port moudle EEPROM infomation for
> given port_id.\n\n"
> > +
> > "show port X rss reta (size) (mask0,mask1,...)\n"
> > " Display the rss redirection table entry
> indicated"
> > " by masks on port X. size is used to indicate the"
> > @@ -7594,6 +7600,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_showdevice = {
> > NULL,
> > },
> > };
> > +
> > +/* ** SHOW EEPROM INFO *** */
> > +struct cmd_showeeprom_result {
> > + cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
> > + cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
> > + cmdline_fixed_string_t type;
> > + uint16_t portnum;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void cmd_showeeprom_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> > + __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
> > + __rte_unused void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct cmd_showeeprom_result *res = parsed_result;
> > +
> > + port_eeprom_display(res->portnum);
> > +}
> > +
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showeeprom_show =
> > + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showeeprom_result, show,
> "show");
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showeeprom_port =
> > + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showeeprom_result, port,
> "port");
> > +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_showeeprom_portnum =
> > + TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showeeprom_result, portnum,
> UINT16);
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showeeprom_type =
> > + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showeeprom_result, type,
> "eeprom");
> > +
> > +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_showeeprom = {
> > + .f = cmd_showeeprom_parsed,
> > + .data = NULL,
> > + .help_str = "show port <port_id> eeprom",
> > + .tokens = {
> > + (void *)&cmd_showeeprom_show,
> > + (void *)&cmd_showeeprom_port,
> > + (void *)&cmd_showeeprom_portnum,
> > + (void *)&cmd_showeeprom_type,
> > + NULL,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* ** SHOW MODULE EEPROM INFO *** */
> > +struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result {
> > + cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
> > + cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
> > + cmdline_fixed_string_t type;
> > + uint16_t portnum;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void cmd_showmoduleeeprom_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> > + __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
> > + __rte_unused void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result *res = parsed_result;
> > +
> > + port_module_eeprom_display(res->portnum);
> > +}
> > +
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showmoduleeeprom_show =
> > + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result,
> show, "show");
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showmoduleeeprom_port =
> > + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result,
> port, "port");
> > +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_showmoduleeeprom_portnum =
> > + TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result, portnum,
> UINT16);
> > +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_showmoduleeeprom_type =
> > + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_showmoduleeeprom_result, type,
> "module_eeprom");
> > +
> > +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_showmoduleeeprom = {
> > + .f = cmd_showmoduleeeprom_parsed,
> > + .data = NULL,
> > + .help_str = "show port <port_id> module_eeprom",
> > + .tokens = {
> > + (void *)&cmd_showmoduleeeprom_show,
> > + (void *)&cmd_showmoduleeeprom_port,
> > + (void *)&cmd_showmoduleeeprom_portnum,
> > + (void *)&cmd_showmoduleeeprom_type,
> > + NULL,
> > + },
> > +};> +
>
> Since both commands are simple and related, what do you think merging their
> implementation? This reduces the clutter.
> Please check '#' usage in the 'TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER', and "port
> start|stop|close all" implementation can be sample.
>
