On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:55:07 +0100 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:56:43AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > This is an improved version of the setup of huge pages > > bases on earlier DPDK setup. Differences are: > > * it autodetects NUMA vs non NUMA > > * it allows setting different page sizes > > recent kernels support multiple sizes. > > * it accepts a parameter in bytes (not pages). > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > > --- > > This is lightly tested, it still needs testing on multiple architectures > > etc. > > > > usertools/hugepage-setup.sh | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 169 insertions(+) > > create mode 100755 usertools/hugepage-setup.sh > > > > diff --git a/usertools/hugepage-setup.sh b/usertools/hugepage-setup.sh > > new file mode 100755 > > index 000000000000..df132e2f8d64 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/usertools/hugepage-setup.sh > > @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ > > +#! /bin/bash > > Is there a good reason to limit this to bash rather than general "sh"? > > Also, if we ever see this script being expanded to cover more, would it be > more extensible in python rather than shell? Mainly because bash has arithmetic operations, and doing it with normal shell requires using expr.
