On 8/17/20 2:15 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> Enhance the dump function to also print the ops index
> and associated mempool ops name
>
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
with a nit below
> ---
> lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c
> b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c
> index 7774f0c8da..10c5cb708f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c
> @@ -1266,6 +1266,7 @@ rte_mempool_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_mempool *mp)
> unsigned lcore_id;
> #endif
> struct rte_mempool_memhdr *memhdr;
> + struct rte_mempool_ops *ops;
> unsigned common_count;
> unsigned cache_count;
> size_t mem_len = 0;
> @@ -1288,6 +1289,10 @@ rte_mempool_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_mempool *mp)
>
> fprintf(f, " private_data_size=%"PRIu32"\n", mp->private_data_size);
>
> + fprintf(f, " ops_index=%d\n", mp->ops_index);
> + ops = rte_mempool_get_ops(mp->ops_index);
> + fprintf(f, " ops_name: <%s>\n", ops ? ops->name : "NA");
DPDK coding style suggests to use explicit comparison vs NULL, i.e.
ops != NULL ? ops->name : "NA"
> +
> STAILQ_FOREACH(memhdr, &mp->mem_list, next)
> mem_len += memhdr->len;
> if (mem_len != 0) {
