Hello,
Is this patch scheduled for merge with dpdk.org ?
Please update me.
Regards,
Gregory
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory Etelson <getel...@mellanox.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 19:15
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Gregory Etelson <getel...@nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad
> <ma...@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>;
> sta...@dpdk.org; Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>; Wenzhuo Lu
> <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Beilei Xing <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Bernard
> Iremonger <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix flow rules list after port stop
>
> According to current RTE API, port flow rules must not be kept after port
> stop.
>
> Testpmd did not flush port flow rules after `port stop' command was called.
> As the result, after the port was restarted, it showed bogus flow rules.
>
> Fixes: ce8d561418d4 ("app/testpmd: add port configuration settings")
>
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getel...@mellanox.com>
> Acked-by: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> 7842c3b781..4ba5c41c6e 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> @@ -2627,6 +2627,9 @@ stop_port(portid_t pid)
> RTE_PORT_HANDLING) == 0)
> continue;
>
> + if (port->flow_list)
> + port_flow_flush(pi);
> +
> rte_eth_dev_stop(pi);
>
> if (rte_atomic16_cmpset(&(port->port_status),
> --
> 2.25.1
