On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 01:14:40 +0000 "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.vargh...@intel.com> wrote:
> snipped > > > > snipped > > > > > > > > snipped > > > > > > > > > > 15/07/2020 23:22, Stephen Hemminger: > > > > > > Printing extra borders does not improve readability, and is just > > > > > > unnecessary. Putting TSC hz in header also makes no sense here. > > > > > > > > > > The CPU frequency on headers! > > > > > OK to remove :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > The rational of having Time Stamp Counter as the header for port > > > > info and > > > stats, is to account for each iteration for an average `packets per > > > second`. That is using `watch -d -n 1 ./dpdk-procinfo -- --xstats | grep > > > -v ": 0"`. > > > > > > > > But if there better way to do this or add as new feature, +1 to remove. > > > > > > > > > > Proc info should just use standard clock for its updates, not TSC? > > > > Can you please explain the rationale behind the (syscall for time) and not > > TSC? > > Looking forward for the patch with clock change too. There is no part of what proc-info is show with xstats that displays or uses tsc directly. Do you have a driver that is putting TSC information in xstats?
