I see there are 3 ACKs: original (see the commit message) from Fan, then Thomas and Akhil. This page: http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=11317 also shows it has 3 ACKs.
Can I ask why it didn't go into 20.08 then? Adam > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > Sent: Saturday, 8 August, 2020 00:05 > To: Dybkowski, AdamX <adamx.dybkow...@intel.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; Zhang, Roy Fan > <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>; step...@networkplumber.org; Burakov, > Anatoly <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; bl...@debian.org; Akhil Goyal > <akhil.go...@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: scheduler API deprecation notice > > 06/08/2020 19:18, Akhil Goyal: > > > 27/07/2020 11:41, Adam Dybkowski: > > > > This patch adds a deprecation notice about upcoming changes in > > > > public API of the Scheduler PMD. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Dybkowski <adamx.dybkow...@intel.com> > > > > Acked-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > +* scheduler: The functions > > > > +``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_slave_attach``, > > > > + ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_slave_detach`` and > > > > + ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_slaves_get`` will be replaced in > > > > +20.11 by > > > > + ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_worker_attach``, > > > > + ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_worker_detach`` and > > > > + ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_workers_get`` accordingly. > > > > > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > > > > > I wonder how this patch got missed. > > > > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com> > > Sorry it is missing an ack. > >
