06/08/2020 12:45, Dekel Peled: > Structs rte_flow_item_eth and rte_flow_item_vlan will be modified, > to include an additional value, indicating existence or absence of VLAN > headers following the current header, as proposed in RFC > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-August/177536.html. > Because of ABI break this change is proposed for 20.11. > > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com> > --- > +* ethdev: The ``struct rte_flow_item_eth`` and ``struct rte_flow_item_vlan`` > + structs will be modified, to include an additional value, indicating > existence > + or absence of a VLAN header following the current header, as proposed in > RFC > + https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-August/177536.html.
Specifying match patterns on none or multiple extensions is difficult to manage with rte_flow. It seems this approach of adding explicit fields in the items can work well. Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
