Hi Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Guo, Jia > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 5:12 PM > To: Sun, GuinanX <guinanx....@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei > <beilei.x...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix link status > > hi, guinan > > On 7/30/2020 4:25 PM, Guinan Sun wrote: > > The PF driver supports to use link_event_adv or link_event to get the > > link speed. However, when using link_event_adv to get link speed, > > there is a lack of logic to convert between link speed type > > (I40E_LINK_SPEED_XXX) and mbps type (SPEED_XXX). > > As a result, the mbps type is not recognized, so the link status down > > problem occurs. This patch is used for type replacement between speed > > types. > > > > Fixes: 2a73125b7041 ("i40evf: fix link info update") > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Guinan Sun <guinanx....@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/i40e/base/virtchnl.h | 8 +++++- > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > - > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_pf.c | 4 +++ > > 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/base/virtchnl.h > > b/drivers/net/i40e/base/virtchnl.h > > index 4f498ca45..90c404fb8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/base/virtchnl.h > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/base/virtchnl.h > > @@ -240,7 +240,8 @@ VIRTCHNL_CHECK_STRUCT_LEN(16, > virtchnl_vsi_resource); > > #define VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_ENCAP 0X00100000 > > #define VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_ENCAP_CSUM 0X00200000 > > #define VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_RX_ENCAP_CSUM 0X00400000 > > - > > +/* Define below the capability flags that are not offloads */ > > +#define VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_ADV_LINK_SPEED 0x00000080 > > #define VF_BASE_MODE_OFFLOADS (VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_L2 | \ > > VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN | \ > > VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_RSS_PF) @@ -540,6 > +541,11 @@ struct > > virtchnl_pf_event { > > enum virtchnl_link_speed link_speed; > > bool link_status; > > } link_event; > > + struct { > > + /* link_speed provided in Mbps */ > > + u32 link_speed; > > + u8 link_status; > > + } link_event_adv; > > } event_data; > > > > int severity; > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c > > index 69cab8e73..f8cf45fbe 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c > > @@ -1386,8 +1386,46 @@ i40evf_handle_pf_event(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, > uint8_t *msg, > > break; > > case VIRTCHNL_EVENT_LINK_CHANGE: > > PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "VIRTCHNL_EVENT_LINK_CHANGE > event"); > > - vf->link_up = pf_msg->event_data.link_event.link_status; > > - vf->link_speed = pf_msg->event_data.link_event.link_speed; > > + > > + if (vf->vf_res->vf_cap_flags & > VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_ADV_LINK_SPEED) { > > + vf->link_up = > > + pf_msg- > >event_data.link_event_adv.link_status; > > + > > + switch (pf_msg- > >event_data.link_event_adv.link_speed) { > > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_100M: > > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_100MB; > > + break; > > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_1G: > > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_1GB; > > + break; > > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_2_5G: > > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_2_5GB; > > + break; > > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_5G: > > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_5GB; > > + break; > > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_10G: > > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_10GB; > > + break; > > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_20G: > > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_20GB; > > + break; > > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_25G: > > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_25GB; > > + break; > > + case ETH_SPEED_NUM_40G: > > + vf->link_speed = I40E_LINK_SPEED_40GB; > > + break; > > + default: > > + vf->link_speed = > I40E_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN; > > + break; > > + } > > + } else { > > + vf->link_up = > > + pf_msg->event_data.link_event.link_status; > > > Is the link_status the same of processing whatever adv speed cap?
They are not the same process, so it's no need to change. > > > > + vf->link_speed = > > + pf_msg->event_data.link_event.link_speed; > > + } > > break; > > case VIRTCHNL_EVENT_PF_DRIVER_CLOSE: > > PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, > "VIRTCHNL_EVENT_PF_DRIVER_CLOSE event"); diff > > --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_pf.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_pf.c index > > 7bf1e7941..33af30bbb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_pf.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_pf.c > > @@ -320,6 +320,10 @@ i40e_pf_host_process_cmd_get_vf_resource(struct > i40e_pf_vf *vf, uint8_t *msg, > > else > > vf->request_caps = *(uint32_t *)msg; > > > > +#ifdef VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_ADV_LINK_SPEED > > + vf_res->vf_cap_flags |= VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_ADV_LINK_SPEED; #endif > /* > > +VIRTCHNL_VF_CAP_ADV_LINK_SPEED */ > > + > > > Below code is after your change here, be careful to use "|=" please. Yes, you are right, Iwill take care of it. But there is a problem with the logic of this code, which will be removed later. > > vf_res->vf_cap_flags = vf->request_caps & > I40E_VIRTCHNL_OFFLOAD_CAPS; > > > > /* enable all RSS by default, > > * doesn't support hena setting by virtchnnl yet. > > */