Hi David,
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 4:24 PM > To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com> > Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; Trahe, Fiona > <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; > Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com>; shal...@marvell.com; Doherty, Declan > <declan.dohe...@intel.com>; Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>; > Ananyev, Konstantin > <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] doc: announce removal of crypto list > end enumerators > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:47 PM Arek Kusztal > <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Enumerators RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_LIST_END, RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_LIST_END, > > RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_LIST_END will be removed to prevent some problems > > that may arise when adding new algorithms. > > How does it cohabitate with Ferruh notice? > Is it a complement? or redundant? > > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst?id=58245da070289f4b248f15 > 970c3f8af73ea601ed > Thanks for drawing attention to this. It's complementary as far as I can see. Ferruh's doesn't list all enums - but doesn’t appear to cover these crypto ones.
