> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 5:39 PM
> To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
> Cc: akhil.go...@nxp.com; dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; nd <n...@arm.com>; dpdk stable
> <sta...@dpdk.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto/armv8: fix typos and compilation
> 
> Hello Ruifeng,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:58 AM Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Typo in debug log switch macro caused debug log cannot be enabled.
> > Fixed the typo to match option defined in config file.
> >
> > Typo in crypto dev name macro caused unexpected device name in log.
> > Fixed the typo to log with correct device name.
> >
> > Solved compilation error when debug log is enabled:
> > rte_armv8_pmd.c: In function ‘process_armv8_chained_op’:
> > rte_armv8_pmd.c:633:22: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘crypto_func’
> >   ARMV8_CRYPTO_ASSERT(crypto_func != NULL);
> >                       ^
> >
> > Fixes: 169ca3db550c ("crypto/armv8: add PMD optimized for ARMv8
> > processors")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> 
> Reported-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
> > ---
> > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-July/175241.html
> >
> >  drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h
> > b/drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h
> > index e08d0df78..b183c739b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h
> > +++ b/drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h
> > @@ -12,25 +12,25 @@
> >
> >  #define ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR(fmt, args...) \
> >         RTE_LOG(ERR, CRYPTODEV, "[%s] %s() line %u: " fmt "\n",  \
> > -                       RTE_STR(CRYPTODEV_NAME_ARMV8_CRYPTO_PMD), \
> > +                       RTE_STR(CRYPTODEV_NAME_ARMV8_PMD), \
> >                         __func__, __LINE__, ## args)
> >
> 
> 
> - Those macros can use a dedicated logtype for this driver rather than pollute
> the CRYPTODEV general logtype.
> 
Agreed. Will add a dedicated logtype for this driver.

> - Looking at their uses:
> drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h:#define
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR(fmt, args...) \
> drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h:#define
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_INFO(fmt, args...) \
> drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h:#define
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_DBG(fmt, args...) \
> drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h:#define
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_INFO(fmt, args...)
> drivers/crypto/armv8/armv8_pmd_private.h:#define
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_DBG(fmt, args...)
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c:           ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR(
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c:
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR(
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c:
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR("Invalid/unsupported operation");
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c:           ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR(
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c:           ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR(
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c:           ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR(
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c:
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR("failed to create cryptodev vdev");
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd.c:   ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR(
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd_ops.c:
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_INFO(
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd_ops.c:
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR(
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd_ops.c:
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR("invalid session struct");
> drivers/crypto/armv8/rte_armv8_pmd_ops.c:
> ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_ERR("failed configure session parameters");
> 
> There is nothing for debug, and the rest of these messages are in setup steps.
> I would rather have them always enabled and remove the debug option
> entirely.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
Agreed. The logs are not in data path. They can be always enabled.
Will change in next version. 

> 
> > -#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_ARMV8_CRYPTO_DEBUG
> > +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_ARMV8_CRYPTO_DEBUG
> >  #define ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_INFO(fmt, args...) \
> >         RTE_LOG(INFO, CRYPTODEV, "[%s] %s() line %u: " fmt "\n", \
> > -                       RTE_STR(CRYPTODEV_NAME_ARMV8_CRYPTO_PMD), \
> > +                       RTE_STR(CRYPTODEV_NAME_ARMV8_PMD), \
> >                         __func__, __LINE__, ## args)
> >
> >  #define ARMV8_CRYPTO_LOG_DBG(fmt, args...) \
> >         RTE_LOG(DEBUG, CRYPTODEV, "[%s] %s() line %u: " fmt "\n", \
> > -                       RTE_STR(CRYPTODEV_NAME_ARMV8_CRYPTO_PMD), \
> > +                       RTE_STR(CRYPTODEV_NAME_ARMV8_PMD), \
> >                         __func__, __LINE__, ## args)
> >
> >  #define ARMV8_CRYPTO_ASSERT(con)                               \
> >  do {                                                           \
> >         if (!(con)) {                                           \
> > -               rte_panic("%s(): "                              \
> > -                   con "condition failed, line %u", __func__); \
> > +               rte_panic("condition failed, line %u",          \
> > +                       __LINE__);                              \
> >         }                                                       \
> >  } while (0)
> 
> 
> RTE_VERIFY does the same.
> 
Yes. Will switch to RTE_VERIFY in next version.

> 
> --
> David Marchand

Reply via email to