W dniu 21.07.2020 o 10:07, David Marchand pisze: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:01 AM Van Haaren, Harry > <harry.van.haa...@intel.com> wrote: >>>>> Honnappa's suggestion in the other reply seems to not work here, as the >>>> "service_may_be_active" >>>>> won't get updated if the service core is stopped after running its final >>>> iteration..? >>> This also is a problem. >>> This needs to be fixed by setting 'service_active_on_lcore' immediately >>> after the >>> service completes running in 'service_run' (rather than waiting for the next >>> iteration of service_run). >> This is a different bug - not directly related to the service_autotest issue >> reported >> here. I'll keep focus & resolve that issue first as it has higher priorty >> due to CI failures. > Is the current bug caught by the CI something introduced by the recent > changes? No, I believe it's not. It's a lack of synchronization issue in test between test procedure and service core that happens to show very rarely. That's why it was so hard to reproduce. > -- Lukasz Wojciechowski Principal Software Engineer
Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics Office +48 22 377 88 25 l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com
