> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ouyang Changchun
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 6:59 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] ether: Check VMDq RSS mode
> 
> Check mq mode for VMDq RSS, handle it correctly instead of returning an error;
> Also remove the limitation of per pool queue number has max value of 1,
> because
> the per pool queue number could be 2 or 4 if it is VMDq RSS mode;
> 
> The number of rxq specified in config will determine the mq mode for VMDq
> RSS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changchun Ouyang <changchun.ouyang at intel.com>
> 
> changes in v6:
>   - More clear error message when queue number is invalid.
> 
> changes in v5:
>   - Fix '<' issue, it should be '<=' to test rxq number;
>   - Extract a function to remove the embeded switch-case statement.
> 
> ---
>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 51
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> index 95f2ceb..e9e3368 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -503,6 +503,31 @@ rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_config(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev, uint16_t nb_queues)
>  }
> 
>  static int
> +rte_eth_dev_check_vf_rss_rxq_num(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q)
> +{
> +     struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> +     switch (nb_rx_q) {
> +     case 1:
> +     case 2:
> +             RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active =
> +                     ETH_64_POOLS;
> +             break;
> +     case 4:
> +             RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active =
> +                     ETH_32_POOLS;
> +             break;
> +     default:
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).nb_q_per_pool = nb_rx_q;
> +     RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).def_pool_q_idx =
> +             dev->pci_dev->max_vfs * nb_rx_q;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
>  rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t
> nb_tx_q,
>                     const struct rte_eth_conf *dev_conf)
>  {
> @@ -510,8 +535,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t
> nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
> 
>       if (RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).active != 0) {
>               /* check multi-queue mode */
> -             if ((dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_RX_RSS) ||
> -                 (dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_RX_DCB) ||
> +             if ((dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_RX_DCB) ||
>                   (dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_RX_DCB_RSS) ||
>                   (dev_conf->txmode.mq_mode == ETH_MQ_TX_DCB)) {
>                       /* SRIOV only works in VMDq enable mode */
> @@ -525,7 +549,6 @@ rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t
> nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>               }
> 
>               switch (dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode) {
> -             case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_RSS:
>               case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_DCB:
>               case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_DCB_RSS:
>                       /* DCB/RSS VMDQ in SRIOV mode, not implement yet
> */
> @@ -534,6 +557,26 @@ rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id,
> uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>                                       "unsupported VMDQ mq_mode rx
> %u\n",
>                                       port_id, dev_conf-
> >rxmode.mq_mode);
>                       return (-EINVAL);
> +             case ETH_MQ_RX_RSS:
> +                     PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%" PRIu8
> +                                     " SRIOV active, "
> +                                     "Rx mq mode is changed from:"
> +                                     "mq_mode %u into VMDQ mq_mode
> %u\n",
> +                                     port_id,
> +                                     dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode,
> +                                     dev->data-
> >dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode);
> +             case ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_RSS:
> +                     dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode =
> ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_RSS;
> +                     if (nb_rx_q <=
> RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).nb_q_per_pool)
> +                             if (rte_eth_dev_check_vf_rss_rxq_num(port_id,
> nb_rx_q) != 0) {
> +                                     PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev
> port_id=%d"
> +                                             " SRIOV active, invalid queue"
> +                                             " number for VMDQ RSS,
> allowed"
> +                                             " value are 1, 2 or 4\n",
> +                                             port_id);
> +                                     return -EINVAL;
> +                             }
> +                     break;
>               default: /* ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_ONLY or ETH_MQ_RX_NONE
> */
>                       /* if nothing mq mode configure, use default scheme */
>                       dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode =
> ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_ONLY;
> @@ -553,8 +596,6 @@ rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t
> nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>               default: /* ETH_MQ_TX_VMDQ_ONLY or ETH_MQ_TX_NONE
> */
>                       /* if nothing mq mode configure, use default scheme */
>                       dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.mq_mode =
> ETH_MQ_TX_VMDQ_ONLY;
> -                     if (RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).nb_q_per_pool > 1)
> -                             RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).nb_q_per_pool = 1;

Why you removed this completely?

>                       break;
>               }
> 
> --
> 1.8.4.2

Reply via email to