On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:51:38AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-01-15 04:27, Ouyang, Changchun: > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhang, Helin > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:23:52PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > Ok, so 1.8.0 came out almost a month ago and none of the patches > > > > > that were deferred waiting for the release got merged since then. > > > > > Last commit in git is the 1.8.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > Where is the post-merge window bundle, where are the later commits? > > > > > Lots of patches are sitting rotting in patchwork... > > > > > > > > +1, I've had the same questions. > > > > Neil > > > > > > +1, Some patch set might be ready for being merged. > > > > +1, the earlier some patches are merged into mainline, and the easier those > > sequent patch sets can resolve their conflicts. > > +1, there are some patches which are properly reviewed > > Reminder: sub-tree to manage specific part of DPDK can be open on request > Ok, I think what you're saying here is you're too busy to handle all the patches comming in at the moment. As such I'd like to propose a sub-tree encompassing all the pmds in DPDK. I would envision that including all the acutal pmd's in the tree, as well as the infrastructure that is used to interface them to the core (i.e. the ethdev/rte_ether library). I'll gladly maintain the patch pool and send you pull requests.
If you could set me up with a login to dpdk.org, I'd appreciate it. Thanks! Neil > -- > Thomas, back on track >
