Some tests are failing on this patch but I don't think the reason
behind the failure is this patch. Is there a certain way to know that
the problem is in the patch or somewhere else?
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:04 PM Sarosh Arif <sarosh.a...@emumba.com> wrote:
>
> Some tests are failing on this patch but I don't think the reason behind the
> failure is this patch. Is there a certain way to know that the problem is in
> the patch or somewhere else?
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:20 PM Sarosh Arif <sarosh.a...@emumba.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sure, will do that.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:08 PM Lukasz Wojciechowski
>> <l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> W dniu 15.04.2020 o 09:06, Sarosh Arif pisze:
>>>
>>> Yes, I plan to work on them when I get time.
>>>
>>> Great, please add me to CC. I would be glad to review it.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:52 AM Lukasz Wojciechowski
>>> <l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> W dniu 15.04.2020 o 08:42, Sarosh Arif pisze:
>>>> > v2:
>>>> > remove double freeing of mbufs
>>>> >
>>>> > Signed-off-by: Sarosh Arif <sarosh.a...@emumba.com>
>>>> > ---
>>>> > app/test/test_distributor.c | 9 +++++++
>>>> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>> >
>>>> > diff --git a/app/test/test_distributor.c b/app/test/test_distributor.c
>>>> > index ba1f81cf8..5e972bb2e 100644
>>>> > --- a/app/test/test_distributor.c
>>>> > +++ b/app/test/test_distributor.c
>>>> > @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ sanity_test(struct worker_params *wp, struct
>>>> > rte_mempool *p)
>>>> > printf("Line %d: Error, not all packets flushed. "
>>>> > "Expected %u, got %u\n",
>>>> > __LINE__, BURST, total_packet_count());
>>>> > + rte_mempool_put_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, BURST);
>>>> > return -1;
>>>> > }
>>>> >
>>>> > @@ -153,6 +154,7 @@ sanity_test(struct worker_params *wp, struct
>>>> > rte_mempool *p)
>>>> > printf("Line %d: Error, not all packets flushed. "
>>>> > "Expected %u, got %u\n",
>>>> > __LINE__, BURST,
>>>> > total_packet_count());
>>>> > + rte_mempool_put_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, BURST);
>>>> > return -1;
>>>> > }
>>>> >
>>>> > @@ -179,6 +181,7 @@ sanity_test(struct worker_params *wp, struct
>>>> > rte_mempool *p)
>>>> > printf("Line %d: Error, not all packets flushed. "
>>>> > "Expected %u, got %u\n",
>>>> > __LINE__, BURST, total_packet_count());
>>>> > + rte_mempool_put_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, BURST);
>>>> > return -1;
>>>> > }
>>>> >
>>>> > @@ -233,6 +236,7 @@ sanity_test(struct worker_params *wp, struct
>>>> > rte_mempool *p)
>>>> > if (num_returned != BIG_BATCH) {
>>>> > printf("line %d: Missing packets, expected %d\n",
>>>> > __LINE__, num_returned);
>>>> > + rte_mempool_put_bulk(p, (void *)many_bufs, BIG_BATCH);
>>>> > return -1;
>>>> > }
>>>> >
>>>> > @@ -247,6 +251,7 @@ sanity_test(struct worker_params *wp, struct
>>>> > rte_mempool *p)
>>>> >
>>>> > if (j == BIG_BATCH) {
>>>> > printf("Error: could not find source packet
>>>> > #%u\n", i);
>>>> > + rte_mempool_put_bulk(p, (void *)many_bufs,
>>>> > BIG_BATCH);
>>>> > return -1;
>>>> > }
>>>> > }
>>>> >
>>>> > 2.17.1
>>>> >
>>>> The sanity_test is ok now and does not have any mempool leaks.
>>>>
>>>> What about other tests in this file: Do you plan to work on them also?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Lukasz Wojciechowski
>>>> Principal Software Engineer
>>>>
>>>> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>>>> Samsung Electronics
>>>> Office +48 22 377 88 25
>>>> l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Lukasz Wojciechowski
>>> Principal Software Engineer
>>>
>>> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>>> Samsung Electronics
>>> Office +48 22 377 88 25
>>> l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
