On 6/3/2020 2:36 AM, Zhao1, Wei wrote: > I am sure i40e FDIR filter also allocate ring for filter programing, it also > has the same issue. Ice NIC the same. > Although we can avoid this issue by change ring name to "igb_tx_ring" and so > on, but the issue of memory for ring not freed after close is still exsit. > Support this comment. If no one take over all the work for all the PMD, we > had better accept this patch.
Agreed. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Renata Saiakhova >> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 5:48 PM >> To: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org >> Cc: Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon >> <tho...@monjalon.net>; Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Memory corruption due to HW rings >> allocation >> >> Hi Ferruh, >> >> thanks for comments, >> >> are the rte_eth_dma_zone_reserve() calls always used to allocate HW rings? It >> is not totally clear to me. That was partly the reason I don't do the fix >> for every >> driver which uses this API. I made fixes in the drivers which uses the same >> pattern to allocate / release queues, for other drivers I was not sure but >> anyway I couldn't spend more time for further investigations. In the company >> I >> work for we use dpdk for our project and maintain it in separate tree, and >> the >> vulnerability with HW rings is a real issue for igb and ixgbe drivers and >> needs to >> be fixed. Therefore I would like this patch to be accepted in order to not >> maintain the fix ourselves. But unfortunately I don't have resources (e.g. >> time) >> to fix the issue for all the drivers, because, as I mentioned, they are not >> following the same pattern to release their queues. So my proposal is that I >> fix >> it in this patch in a number of drivers (including igb, ixgbe and i40e) and >> others >> can take over and improve other drivers, if they see the same issue. This is >> also >> a reason why the drivers' changes are not in one commit for all the drivers. >> >> For the proposal adding pmd name as prefix to queue memzone name or >> update the 'rte_eth_dma_zone_reserve()' to check the size & alignment >> instead of just a name, I don't know, as an external person, how sensitive >> dpdk >> project to change an internal API and existing code (the call should be >> changed >> in all the drivers). But anyway, I think the real problem is more an absence >> of >> memzone pointer, and in long term it should be solved in this way, rather >> than >> search by name. >> >> Kind regards, >> Renata >> ________________________________ >> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 5:22 PM >> To: Renata Saiakhova <renata.saiakh...@ekinops.com>; dev@dpdk.org >> <dev@dpdk.org> >> Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon >> <tho...@monjalon.net>; Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Memory corruption due to HW rings >> allocation >> >> On 5/13/2020 2:14 PM, Renata Saiakhova wrote: >>> igb and ixgbe and some other drivers allocate HW rings using >>> rte_eth_dma_zone_reserve(), which checks first if the memzone exists >>> for a given name, consisting of port id, queue_id, rx/tx direction, but not >>> for >> the size, alignment, and socket_id. >>> If the memzone with a given name exists it is returned, otherwise it >>> is allocated. >>> Disconnecting dpdk port from one type of interface (igb) and >>> connecting it to another type of interface (ixgbe) for the same port >>> id, potentially creates memory overlap and corruption, because it may >> require memzone of bigger size. >>> That's what is happening from switching from igb to ixgbe having the >>> same port id. >>> >>> v2->v3: Remove #undef ETH_DMA_MZONE_NAME and minor changes in >> code >>> v2->standard >>> v1->v2: Minor changes on code standard and additional fixes in i40e em >>> v1->and ice drivers >>> >>> Renata Saiakhova (4): >>> librte_ethdev: Introduce a function to release HW rings >>> drivers/net: Fix in igb and ixgbe HW rings memory >>> drivers/net: Fix in i40e HW rings memory overlap >>> drivers/net: Fix in em and ice HW rings memory overlap >> >> I think all driver patches can be squashed into single patch, overall they >> are >> implementing same logic. >> >> But as mentioned before, there are multiple other drivers allocating HW rings >> with exact same name. At least I can see: >> iavf >> nfp >> fm10k >> axgbe >> >> Or how can we know if a new PMD won't cause exact same behavior? What to >> you think adding pmd name as prefix to queue memzone name for all PMDs? >> This can help new PMDs using existing code as sample. >> >> I don't know if it has been discussed before, but wouldn't update the >> 'rte_eth_dma_zone_reserve()' to check the size & alignment instead of just >> name fix the issue for all drivers without needing to update them?