Hi， Chas Williams & Sergey Lvov
There was a two-patch series about bonding those are still in reviewing
state，
and the one of them includes the identical modification. Thanks.
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68742/
The series include two patches:
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68742/
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68743/
Best Regards
Xavier
On 2020/6/19 4:32, Chas Williams wrote:
Yes, this does look like a typo on someone's part.
Please change use net/bonding: instead of pmd_bond:
Please add a Fixes: line
Please add a Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
On 6/17/20 3:02 PM, Sergey Lvov wrote:
> It seems to be a typo
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Lvov <log0d...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> index 612a64599..3ef0df84a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
> @@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ mac_address_slaves_update(struct rte_eth_dev
*bonded_eth_dev)
> if (internals->slaves[i].port_id ==
> internals->current_primary_port) {
> if (rte_eth_dev_default_mac_addr_set(
> - internals->primary_port,
> + internals->current_primary_port,
> bonded_eth_dev->data->mac_addrs)) {
> RTE_BOND_LOG(ERR, "Failed to update port Id %d
MAC address",
> internals->current_primary_port);
>
