On 6/12/20 2:37 PM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
> On 11/06/20 23:37 +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> This patch introduces vDPA device class. It will enable
>> application to iterate over the vDPA devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_vhost/vdpa.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vdpa.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vdpa.c
>> index b2b2a105f1..61ab9aadb4 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vdpa.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vdpa.c
>> @@ -10,11 +10,12 @@
>>  
>>  #include <stdbool.h>
>>  
>> +#include <rte_class.h>
>>  #include <rte_malloc.h>
>>  #include "rte_vdpa.h"
>>  #include "vhost.h"
>>  
>> -static struct rte_vdpa_device *vdpa_devices[MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
>> +static struct rte_vdpa_device vdpa_devices[MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
>>  static uint32_t vdpa_device_num;
>>  
>>  static bool
>> @@ -46,35 +47,28 @@ rte_vdpa_register_device(struct rte_vdpa_dev_addr *addr,
>>              struct rte_vdpa_dev_ops *ops)
>>  {
>>      struct rte_vdpa_device *dev;
>> -    char device_name[MAX_VDPA_NAME_LEN];
>>      int i;
>>  
>>      if (vdpa_device_num >= MAX_VHOST_DEVICE || addr == NULL || ops == NULL)
>>              return -1;
>>  
>>      for (i = 0; i < MAX_VHOST_DEVICE; i++) {
>> -            dev = vdpa_devices[i];
>> -            if (dev && is_same_vdpa_device(&dev->addr, addr))
>> +            dev = &vdpa_devices[i];
>> +            if (dev->ops && is_same_vdpa_device(&dev->addr, addr))
>>                      return -1;
>>      }
>>  
>>      for (i = 0; i < MAX_VHOST_DEVICE; i++) {
>> -            if (vdpa_devices[i] == NULL)
>> +            if (vdpa_devices[i].ops == NULL)
>>                      break;
>>      }
>>  
>>      if (i == MAX_VHOST_DEVICE)
>>              return -1;
>>  
>> -    snprintf(device_name, sizeof(device_name), "vdpa-dev-%d", i);
>> -    dev = rte_zmalloc(device_name, sizeof(struct rte_vdpa_device),
>> -                    RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
>> -    if (!dev)
>> -            return -1;
>> -
>> +    dev = &vdpa_devices[i];
>>      memcpy(&dev->addr, addr, sizeof(struct rte_vdpa_dev_addr));
>>      dev->ops = ops;
>> -    vdpa_devices[i] = dev;
>>      vdpa_device_num++;
>>  
>>      return i;
>> @@ -83,11 +77,10 @@ rte_vdpa_register_device(struct rte_vdpa_dev_addr *addr,
>>  int
>>  rte_vdpa_unregister_device(int did)
>>  {
>> -    if (did < 0 || did >= MAX_VHOST_DEVICE || vdpa_devices[did] == NULL)
>> +    if (did < 0 || did >= MAX_VHOST_DEVICE || vdpa_devices[did].ops == NULL)
>>              return -1;
>>  
>> -    rte_free(vdpa_devices[did]);
>> -    vdpa_devices[did] = NULL;
>> +    memset(&vdpa_devices[did], 0, sizeof(struct rte_vdpa_device));
>>      vdpa_device_num--;
>>  
>>      return did;
>> @@ -103,8 +96,11 @@ rte_vdpa_find_device_id(struct rte_vdpa_dev_addr *addr)
>>              return -1;
>>  
>>      for (i = 0; i < MAX_VHOST_DEVICE; ++i) {
>> -            dev = vdpa_devices[i];
>> -            if (dev && is_same_vdpa_device(&dev->addr, addr))
>> +            dev = &vdpa_devices[i];
>> +            if (dev->ops == NULL)
>> +                    continue;
>> +
>> +            if (is_same_vdpa_device(&dev->addr, addr))
>>                      return i;
>>      }
>>  
>> @@ -117,7 +113,7 @@ rte_vdpa_get_device(int did)
>>      if (did < 0 || did >= MAX_VHOST_DEVICE)
>>              return NULL;
>>  
>> -    return vdpa_devices[did];
>> +    return &vdpa_devices[did];
>>  }
>>  
>>  int
>> @@ -227,3 +223,87 @@ rte_vdpa_relay_vring_used(int vid, uint16_t qid, void 
>> *vring_m)
>>              free_ind_table(idesc);
>>      return -1;
>>  }
>> +
>> +static uint16_t
>> +vdpa_dev_to_id(const struct rte_vdpa_device *dev)
>> +{
>> +    if (dev == NULL)
>> +            return MAX_VHOST_DEVICE;
> 
> I know it comes from ethdev, this helper was introduced by 214ed1acd12
> and changed the comparison type from ptrdiff_t to uin16_t.
> 
> This is incorrect, ideally it should instead be a ptrdiff_t, then
> if within acceptable range it should be casted to uin16_t to be used as
> an index.
> 
>> +    return dev - vdpa_devices;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +vdpa_dev_match(struct rte_vdpa_device *dev,
>> +          const struct rte_device *rte_dev)
>> +{
>> +    struct rte_vdpa_dev_addr addr;
>> +
>> +    /*  Only PCI bus supported for now */
>> +    if (strcmp(rte_dev->bus->name, "pci") != 0)
>> +            return -1;
>> +
>> +    addr.type = VDPA_ADDR_PCI;
>> +
>> +    if (rte_pci_addr_parse(rte_dev->name, &addr.pci_addr) != 0)
>> +            return -1;
>> +
>> +    if (!is_same_vdpa_device(&dev->addr, &addr))
>> +            return -1;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Generic rte_vdpa_dev comparison function. */
>> +typedef int (*rte_vdpa_cmp_t)(struct rte_vdpa_device *,
>> +            const struct rte_device *rte_dev);
>> +
>> +static struct rte_vdpa_device *
>> +vdpa_find_device(const struct rte_vdpa_device *start, rte_vdpa_cmp_t cmp,
>> +            struct rte_device *rte_dev)
>> +{
>> +    struct rte_vdpa_device *dev;
>> +    ptrdiff_t idx;
> 
> The ptrdiff_t was used in ethdev due to the original
> 
>    start - &rte_eth_devices[0] + 1;
> 
> The diff was removed by commit 214ed1acd12 . 'idx' should be
> the proper type to hold a device id, here probably uint16_t.

Ok, makes sense.

> Ethdev class should be cleaned up as well.
> 
>> +
>> +    /* Avoid Undefined Behaviour */
>> +    if (start != NULL &&
>> +        (start < &vdpa_devices[0] ||
>> +         start >= &vdpa_devices[MAX_VHOST_DEVICE]))
>> +            return NULL;
> 
> Same as before, this guard made sense mostly for the diff following.
> It is coupled to the "random ptr to static array" comparison happening,
> it would be better in vpda_dev_to_id() I think.

OK, I will clean that in next version, but but this part moves away
later in the series, when switching to linked-list.

Thanks,
Maxime

>> +
>> +    if (start != NULL)
>> +            idx = vdpa_dev_to_id(start) + 1;
>> +    else
>> +            idx = 0;
>> +    for (; idx < MAX_VHOST_DEVICE; idx++) {
>> +            dev = &vdpa_devices[idx];
>> +            /*
>> +             * ToDo: Certainly better to introduce a state field,
>> +             * but rely on ops being set for now.
>> +             */
>> +            if (dev->ops == NULL)
>> +                    continue;
>> +            if (cmp(dev, rte_dev) == 0)
>> +                    return dev;
>> +    }
>> +    return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void *
>> +vdpa_dev_iterate(const void *start,
>> +            const char *str,
>> +            const struct rte_dev_iterator *it)
>> +{
>> +    struct rte_vdpa_device *vdpa_dev = NULL;
>> +
>> +    RTE_SET_USED(str);
>> +
>> +    vdpa_dev = vdpa_find_device(start, vdpa_dev_match, it->device);
>> +
>> +    return vdpa_dev;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct rte_class rte_class_vdpa = {
>> +    .dev_iterate = vdpa_dev_iterate,
>> +};
>> +
>> +RTE_REGISTER_CLASS(vdpa, rte_class_vdpa);
>> -- 
>> 2.26.2
>>
> 

Reply via email to