On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:14:50 +0000 "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> wrote:
> > organization is a little specific, with an lcore that does most init work > > and spawns the others, but then runs the application like all others. > > > > I'd propose instead leader lcore - there is this idea that the leader > > is still a member of the team and will participate in the work. > > > > Leader / worker? > > > > I personally doubt such changes are needed at all. > Code churn will be massive for both DPDK itself and related user projects. > With no real gain in return, from my perspective. > Konstantin > Your concern is valid but the issue does need to be addressed. If now when? This is as a good a time as any to do it. Increasing diversity and inclusion is an overarching goal of many organizations include my employer(Microsoft), the parent organization of DPDK(LF) and my values. Following values is more important than minor replacement of text in API.
