On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:58 PM Jerin Jacob <jerinjac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > It seems that what you are describing it the port action with > > > > > representors, or any > > > > > other way you wish to implement it. > > > > > > > > Let's say we have a VF with kernel and we want to send the traffic to > > > > that VF, then we can't > > > > Use port action. This will be useful in those scenarios. > > > > > > Sorry I don't understand. > > > You mean the VF is managed by a kernel driver while the PF is managed by > > > DPDK? > > > So what prevents having a VF representor? > > > > The discussion did not reach a conclusion. > > Looking at patchwork, I can see it set to "Not Applicable". > > > > Do you still expect some work on this subject? > > No. We dont need API change, we can manage with VF representor.
Ok, thanks for confirming. I will mark this patch as Rejected. "Not Applicable" is used for patches not for dpdk: - patches for pktgen which uses dev@dpdk.org mailing list, - incorrect patches sent to dev@dpdk.org, - patches for stable branches, -- David Marchand
