On Sat, 23 May 2020 13:21:30 -0400
Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In order to write a packet with hardware timestamp enabled into a
> PCAP file, we need to convert its device specific raw timestamp first.
> 
> This might not be trivial since querying the raw clock value from
> the device is still experimental, and derivating the frequency would
> ideally require an additional alarm thread.
> 
> As a first step, pass the mbuf to the timestamp calculation function
> since mbuf->port and mbuf->timestamp would be needed, and add a TODO
> note. No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c b/drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c
> index 68588c3d7..f205a28e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c
> @@ -290,10 +290,16 @@ eth_null_rx(void *queue __rte_unused,
>  #define NSEC_PER_SEC 1e9
>  
>  static inline void
> -calculate_timestamp(struct timeval *ts) {
> +calculate_timestamp(const struct rte_mbuf *mbuf, struct timeval *ts) {
>       uint64_t cycles;
>       struct timeval cur_time;
>  
> +     if (mbuf->ol_flags & PKT_RX_TIMESTAMP) {
> +             /* TODO: convert mbuf->timestamp into nanoseconds instead.
> +                 * See rte_eth_read_clock().
> +                 */
> +     }
> +
>       cycles = rte_get_timer_cycles() - start_cycles;
>       cur_time.tv_sec = cycles / hz;
>       cur_time.tv_usec = (cycles % hz) * NSEC_PER_SEC / hz;
> @@ -339,7 +345,7 @@ eth_pcap_tx_dumper(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, 
> uint16_t nb_pkts)
>                       caplen = sizeof(temp_data);
>               }
>  
> -             calculate_timestamp(&header.ts);
> +             calculate_timestamp(mbuf, &header.ts);
>               header.len = len;
>               header.caplen = caplen;
>               /* rte_pktmbuf_read() returns a pointer to the data directly
> -- 

NAK
What is the point of this patch.
Most projects do not accept speculative patches. Instead incorporate this
patch in when you have code that uses it.

Reply via email to