In i40e PMD code of function i40e_res_pool_free(), if valid_entry
is freed by "rte_free(valid_entry);" in the code, then the following
code for pool update may still use the wild pointer "valid_entry"
for pool info update. It seems has the risk of core dump for
using wild pointer operation, we should avoid this risk.

Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Fixes: 4861cde46116 ("i40e: new poll mode driver")

Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zh...@intel.com>

---

v2:
update commit log

v3:
set free pointer to NULL
---
 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
index 749d85f54..c9601d683 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
@@ -4936,6 +4936,7 @@ i40e_res_pool_free(struct i40e_res_pool_info *pool,
        struct pool_entry *entry, *next, *prev, *valid_entry = NULL;
        uint32_t pool_offset;
        int insert;
+       uint16_t len;
 
        if (pool == NULL) {
                PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Invalid parameter");
@@ -4973,6 +4974,7 @@ i40e_res_pool_free(struct i40e_res_pool_info *pool,
        }
 
        insert = 0;
+       len = valid_entry->len;
        /* Try to merge with next one*/
        if (next != NULL) {
                /* Merge with next one */
@@ -4993,8 +4995,10 @@ i40e_res_pool_free(struct i40e_res_pool_info *pool,
                        if (insert == 1) {
                                LIST_REMOVE(valid_entry, next);
                                rte_free(valid_entry);
+                               valid_entry = NULL;
                        } else {
                                rte_free(valid_entry);
+                               valid_entry = NULL;
                                insert = 1;
                        }
                }
@@ -5010,8 +5014,8 @@ i40e_res_pool_free(struct i40e_res_pool_info *pool,
                        LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&pool->free_list, valid_entry, next);
        }
 
-       pool->num_free += valid_entry->len;
-       pool->num_alloc -= valid_entry->len;
+       pool->num_free += len;
+       pool->num_alloc -= len;
 
        return 0;
 }
-- 
2.19.1

Reply via email to