On 08/04/2020 16:22, David Marchand wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 5:05 PM Gavin Hu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]> >>> Hi Gavin, I lost track if v2 is still a candidate for merge. fwiw, it >>> compiles without giving the zero-length-bounds warning on my system. >>> >>> Kevin. >> >> Yes, this path alone is a candidate for merge. > > This patch is not mergeable, it would trigger failures in the ABI checks. >
Sent http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/[email protected] as this patch was not reworked/merged. Kevin. > You can see in patchwork that the robot reported a warning in Travis. > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-March/119919.html > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/295652710#L4476 > > > I opened a bz to libabigail. > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25661 > > > Either a different solution is found, or your patch will have to deal > with this issue (libabigail fix won't be ready soon afaik) and waive > this. > >
