Hi Akhil,

I didn't see this - checking again.

Ray K

On 09/05/2020 22:11, Akhil Goyal wrote:
> Hi Ray/Arek,
> 
> I still see Incompatible cryptodev even after update in the abignore list.
> I checked it with ./devtools/validate-abi.sh
> NOTICE: ABI may be incompatible, check reports/logs for details.
> NOTICE: Incompatible list:  librte_cryptodev.so
> 
> Did I miss something?
> 
> 
>>
>> On 07/05/2020 11:57, Arek Kusztal wrote:
>>> This patch adds versioned function rte_cryptodev_info_get()
>>> to prevent some issues with ABI policy.
>>> Node v21 works in same way as before, returning driver capabilities
>>> directly to the API caller. These capabilities may include new elements
>>> not part of the v20 ABI.
>>> Node v20 function maintains compatibility with v20 ABI releases
>>> by stripping out elements not supported in v20 ABI. Because
>>> rte_cryptodev_info_get is called by other API functions,
>>> rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_get function is versioned the same way.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> - changed version numbers of symbols to 20.0.2
>>> v3:
>>> - added v2/v3 informations
>>> - changed version numbers of symbols to 21
>>> v4:
>>> - fixed clang build by movind binding default symbol
>>> - implemented mailing list comments
>>> - added abidiff tool suppression entries
>>> v5:
>>> - fixed meson build
>>>
>>>  devtools/libabigail.abignore                   |   8 ++
>>>  lib/librte_cryptodev/meson.build               |   1 +
>>>  lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c           | 147
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h           |  34 +++++-
>>>  lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_version.map |   7 ++
>>>  5 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>> [SNIP]
>>
>> Acked-by: Ray Kinsella <m...@ashroe.eu>

Reply via email to