On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 2:17 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:

> On 5/5/2020 8:17 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> > From: Kishore Padmanabha <kishore.padmana...@broadcom.com>
> >
> > Fix a buffer overrun issue spotted by coverity while accessing
> > the array ulp_device_params.
>
> If it is spotted by coverity, is there a coverity issue id?
>
Yes. But in an internal scan.
I haven't seen anything reported in this area in the latest coverity report
against 20.05-rc1.


> >
> > Fixes: 313ac35ac701 ("net/bnxt: support ULP session manager init")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kishore Padmanabha <kishore.padmana...@broadcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Baucom <michael.bau...@broadcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_template_db.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_template_db.c
> b/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_template_db.c
> > index 86384169f..e89aefad4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_template_db.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_template_db.c
> > @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ struct bnxt_ulp_def_ident_info ulp_def_ident_tbl[] =
> {
> >       }
> >  };
> >
> > -struct bnxt_ulp_device_params ulp_device_params[] = {
> > +struct bnxt_ulp_device_params
> ulp_device_params[BNXT_ULP_DEVICE_ID_LAST] = {
> >       [BNXT_ULP_DEVICE_ID_WH_PLUS] = {
> >               .global_fid_enable       = BNXT_ULP_SYM_YES,
> >               .byte_order              = (enum bnxt_ulp_byte_order)
> >
>
>

Reply via email to