Thank for your explanation.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 5:29 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>;
> maxime.le...@6wind.com; Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/3] doc: input set requirement of each
> pctype for FDIR
>
> On 5/6/2020 2:05 AM, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> > HI, Ferruh
> >
> > This is the patch enable FDIR for flow filter, so we can use this.
> >
> > Fixes: 14c66a451ef ("net/i40e: parse flow director filter ")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Updated the commit log, thanks.
>
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 6:19 PM
> >> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>;
> >> maxime.le...@6wind.com; Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/3] doc: input set requirement
> >> of each pctype for FDIR
> >>
> >> On 4/30/2020 1:52 AM, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 6:35 PM
> >>>> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >>>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>;
> >>>> maxime.le...@6wind.com
> >>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/3] doc: input set
> >>>> requirement of each pctype for FDIR
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/29/2020 3:03 AM, Wei Zhao wrote:
> >>>>> Add input set requirement info to i40e doc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bugzilla ID: 403
> >>>>
> >>>> Should this document update backported to the LTS?
> >>>> If so which LTS versions are in the scope, it is better if you can
> >>>> add a fixes tag to help us to figure out that.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe we can use this, it is the latest update for i40 doc.
> >>> Btw, this is not a bug although it is report in bug list.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 3d91e097a352 ("doc: add feature support matrix link in i40e
> >>> guide ")
> >>
> >> Hi Wei,
> >>
> >> I agree this is not bug, but this documents a limitation for users.
> >> And if this limitation is valid for the stable trees, it make sense
> >> to update documentation for those releases too, so that they can have
> correct/complete documentation.
> >> I will add the "sta...@dpdk.org" tag to request the backport.
> >>
> >> But next question is for which stable trees is this limitation valid,
> >> it would be wrong to document a limitation that doesn't have the
> >> feature, how a stable tree maintainer can know if this issue is valid for a
> specific stable tree or not.
> >> For that we need the commit that introduces the mentioned feature
> >> (and the limitation), I don't think the commit above really is that
> >> commit, that is unrelated doc commit, but we need the commit for code.
> >>
> >> If you can provide correct fixes line, I will update it in the next-net.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> ferruh
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zh...@intel.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst | 7 +++++++
> >>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst b/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst
> >>>>> index 416b3904e..f085a357c 100644
> >>>>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst
> >>>>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst
> >>>>> @@ -747,6 +747,13 @@ Use 16 Bytes RX Descriptor Size As i40e
> PMD
> >>>>> supports both 16 and 32 bytes RX descriptor sizes, and 16 bytes
> >>>>> size can
> >>>> provide helps to high performance of small packets.
> >>>>> Configuration of ``CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_16BYTE_RX_DESC`` in
> >>>>> config
> >>>> files can be changed to use 16 bytes size RX descriptors.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +input set requirement of each pctype for FDIR
> >>>>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +Each PCTYPE can only have one specific FDIR input set at one time.
> >>>>> +For example, if creating 2 rte_flow rules with different input
> >>>>> +set for one PCTYPE, it is will fail and return the info "Conflict
> >>>>> +with the first rule's
> >>>> input set", which means the current rule's input set is conflict
> >>>> with the first rule's. Remove the first rule if want to change the
> >>>> input set of the
> >> PCTYPE.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> Example of getting best performance with l3fwd example
> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >
