On 5/5/2020 9:37 PM, David Christensen wrote: >>>> I can't find "rte_altivec.h", am I missing something. >>>> >>>> With just ignoring "-Warray-bounds" changes, I confirm ena build issue is >>>> fixed >>>> with gcc 9.1 >>> >>> The rte_altivec.h is related to another open patch required to build on >>> POWER systems (http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/69605/) that's waiting to >>> be accepted. You may not have encountered it if you're not building the >>> MLX5 PMD which has additional library requirements. >>> >> >> I see, I missed it. Looks good on top of that patch, although it still >> doesn't >> apply cleanly. >> >> It helps to put a comment to the patch about the dependent patch if it is not >> merged yet. > > It was an oversight on my part, forgetting that I had another patch > installed. I can submit a corrected version if you think it's necessary > but then that that patch will have to be adjusted when it's eventually > merged. Sorry for the confusion. >
No worries, but I won't be merging the patches, it looks easy to manage the conflict but eventually it is up to David to have a new version or not.
