ah ok, the particular system I made the change on was Ubuntu 18.04.2. which is libabigail 1.2.0.
Given we still support v19.11 on Ubuntu 18.04.2. I think it's worthwhile keeping the suppression until v20.11? Ray K On 24/04/2020 15:10, David Marchand wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:48 AM Ray Kinsella <m...@ashroe.eu> wrote: >> >> Change references to abi 20.0.1 to use abi v21, add myself as the map >> file maintainer to more closely monitor future abi changes. Add >> suppressions that were missed on changes to librte_lpm. > > About the lpm change below, this might be because you are using an old > version of libabigail. > I think the change went in: > $ git describe --contains 215b7eb4 > libabigail-1.4~8 > > I use either libabigail 1.7 or the current master (when testing Dodji > enhancements). > > >> diff --git a/devtools/libabigail.abignore b/devtools/libabigail.abignore >> index cd86d89ca..20c821cee 100644 >> --- a/devtools/libabigail.abignore >> +++ b/devtools/libabigail.abignore >> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ >> symbol_version = EXPERIMENTAL >> [suppress_variable] >> symbol_version = EXPERIMENTAL >> - >> ; Explicit ignore for driver-only ABI >> [suppress_type] >> name = rte_cryptodev_ops >> @@ -18,3 +17,15 @@ >> [suppress_type] >> type_kind = struct >> name = rte_event_ring >> +; Explicit ignore ABI 20.0.1 >> +[suppress_function] >> + symbol_version = DPDK_20.0.1 >> +[suppress_variable] >> + symbol_version = DPDK_20.0.1 >> +; Explicit ignore of const lpm6_lookup change >> +[suppress_function] >> + name = rte_lpm6_delete >> + parameter = '1 uint8_t* >> +[suppress_function] >> + name = rte_lpm6_is_rule_present >> + parameter = '1 uint8_t* > >
