Meeting notes for the DPDK technical board meeting held on 2020-04-22

Attendees:
        - Bruce Richardson
        - Ferruh Yigit
        - Hemant Agrawal
        - Honnappa Nagarahalli (Chair)
        - Jerin Jacob
        - Kevin Traynor
        - Konstantin Ananyev
        - Maxime Coquelin
        - Olivier Matz
        - Stephen Hemminger
        - Thomas Monjalon

NOTE: The technical board meetings every second Wednesday on IRC channel  
#dpdk-board, at 3pm UTC. Meetings are public and DPDK community members are 
welcome to attend.

NOTE: Next meeting will be on Wednesday 2020-05-06 @3pm UTC, and will be 
chaired by Jerin

1) Merging app/test-flow-perf in 20.05
        - This application will be kept separate from testpmd
        - It is approved to be merged in 20.05

2) Timeline to stop using rte_atomicNN_xx, rte_smp_*mb APIs (other barrier 
APIs, rte_*mb, rte_cio_*mb, rte_io_*mb, are allowed to be used)
        - The formal deprecation of these APIs, which affects the DPDK 
applications, is postponed to a later point
        - It was agreed to stop accepting new code with the above APIs after 
20.05 release
                (subject to the availability of the patch for wrappers for C11 
atomic built-ins) - AI, Honnappa
        - Add a note in the release notes to indicate the same - AI, Honnappa

3) Wrappers for C11 atomic built-ins will not be available for 20.05. Patches 
using C11 atomic built-ins will be accepted for 20.05
    (as there is already lot of code with C11 atomic built-ins)

4) Need volunteers for maintaining C11 code
        - This role is to support the maintainers with questions, help debug 
issues
        - It would be good to have one maintainer from each supported 
architecture, volunteers are needed
        - Honnappa is the maintainer from Arm

5) Ask Windows team to build and test with C11 code enabled in CI (for ex: 
rte_ring) - AI, Thomas

6) Multi-function chaining APIs
        - A conclusion could not be reached. The discussion/voting is still 
ongoing. I will post the update once the decision is done.

Thank you,
Honnappa

Reply via email to