Actually looking at app/test/test_security.c I also see a few '#ifdef RTE_DEBUG's. Let say:
+static int +test_get_userdata_inv_context(void) +{ +#ifdef RTE_DEBUG + uint64_t md = 0xDEADBEEF; + + void *ret = rte_security_get_userdata(NULL, md); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_get_userdata, + ret, NULL, "%p"); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_get_userdata_exp, 0); + + return TEST_SUCCESS; +#else + return TEST_SKIPPED; +#endif +} What is the point? Why not always run the test unconditionally? > -----Original Message----- > From: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 12:52 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: akhil.go...@nxp.com; Doherty, Declan <declan.dohe...@intel.com>; Ananyev, > Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH] security: fix crash at accessing non-implemented ops > > Valid checks for optional function pointers inside dev-ops > were disabled by undefined macro. > > Fixes: b6ee98547847 ("security: fix verification of parameters") > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> > --- > lib/librte_security/rte_security.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_security/rte_security.c > b/lib/librte_security/rte_security.c > index d475b0977..b65430ce2 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_security/rte_security.c > +++ b/lib/librte_security/rte_security.c > @@ -107,11 +107,9 @@ rte_security_set_pkt_metadata(struct rte_security_ctx > *instance, > struct rte_security_session *sess, > struct rte_mbuf *m, void *params) > { > -#ifdef RTE_DEBUG > RTE_PTR_CHAIN3_OR_ERR_RET(instance, ops, set_pkt_metadata, -EINVAL, > -ENOTSUP); > RTE_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(sess, -EINVAL); > -#endif > return instance->ops->set_pkt_metadata(instance->device, > sess, m, params); > } > @@ -121,9 +119,7 @@ rte_security_get_userdata(struct rte_security_ctx > *instance, uint64_t md) > { > void *userdata = NULL; > > -#ifdef RTE_DEBUG > RTE_PTR_CHAIN3_OR_ERR_RET(instance, ops, get_userdata, NULL, NULL); > -#endif > if (instance->ops->get_userdata(instance->device, md, &userdata)) > return NULL; > > -- > 2.17.1