> Separately comparing major and minor versions becomes seriously clumsy > when with major version changes, convert the entire version string into > a numeric value (ie 4.6.0 becomes 460 and 5.0.0 becomes 500) and use > that for comparisons, eliminate unnecessary negations while at it. > This makes the comparisons simpler, more obvious and makes gcc 5.0 > naturally recognized at least as capable as newest 4.x. > > This three-digit scheme would run into trouble if gcc ever went to > two-digit version segments, but that hasn't happened in the last 10+ > years so it seems like a safe assumption. > > Signed-off-by: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> Applied, thanks
