> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Guy Kaneti
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 2:12 PM
> To: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
> <jer...@marvell.com>; xiang.w.w...@intel.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> <pbhagavat...@marvell.com>; Shahaf Shuler <shah...@mellanox.com>;
> hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Opher Reviv <op...@mellanox.com>; Alex
> Rosenbaum <al...@mellanox.com>; Dovrat Zifroni <dov...@marvell.com>;
> Prasun Kapoor <pkap...@marvell.com>; nipun.gu...@nxp.com;
> bruce.richard...@intel.com; yang.a.h...@intel.com; harry.ch...@intel.com;
> gu.ji...@zte.com.cn; shanjia...@chinatelecom.cn;
> zhangy....@chinatelecom.cn; lixin...@huachentel.com; wush...@inspur.com;
> yuying...@yxlink.com; fanchengg...@sunyainfo.com;
> davidf...@tencent.com; liuzho...@chinaunicom.cn;
> zhaoyon...@huawei.com; o...@yunify.com; j...@netgate.com;
> hongjun...@intel.com; j.bromh...@titan-ic.com; d...@ntop.org;
> f...@napatech.com; arthur...@lionic.com; Thomas Monjalon
> <tho...@monjalon.net>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] regexdev: implement regex rte level
> functions
>
> Hi,
>
> > +int
> > +rte_regexdev_is_valid_dev(uint16_t dev_id) {
> > + if (dev_id >= RTE_MAX_REGEXDEV_DEVS ||
> > + rte_regex_devices[dev_id].state != RTE_REGEXDEV_READY)
> > + return 0;
> > + return 1;
> > +}
>
> When is the state changed to RTE_REGEXDEV_READY?
> Should the PMD change it at the end of probing?
Yes,
Best,
Ori
