2015-02-19 15:21, Bruce Richardson: > Confirmed, this worked for me too. > Looking at the patches, they look good. However, one thing I think we are > missing > is a unit test to verify that all our CRC implementations give the same > result. > That would be useful as a sanity check of the software fallback especially. > The > existing hash tests, test the hash table implementation rather than the > mathematical argorithm used to compute the hash values. > > Overall, though, software fallback for CRC is something well worthwhile > having. > > Series Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
Applied, thanks Note: running doxygen compilation helped me to find and fix a small mismatch (parameter alg was flag in comment).
