> -----Original Message----- > From: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech> > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 8:22 PM > To: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; bruce.richard...@intel.com; > acon...@redhat.com; maicolgabr...@hotmail.com; Ruifeng Wang > <ruifeng.w...@arm.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] build: port arm32 options from make > to meson > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 2:01 PM > > To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech>; > > bruce.richard...@intel.com; acon...@redhat.com; > > maicolgabr...@hotmail.com; ruifeng.w...@arm.com > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] build: port arm32 options from > > make to meson > > > > On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 11:25 +0000, Juraj Linkeš wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 10:53 AM > > > > To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech>; > > > > bruce.richard...@intel.com; acon...@redhat.com; > > > > maicolgabr...@hotmail.com; ruifeng.w...@arm.com > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] build: port arm32 options > > > > from make to meson > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 06:16 +0000, Juraj Linkeš wrote: > > > > > Hi Luca, > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 1:45 PM > > > > > > To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech>; > > > > > > bruce.richard...@intel.com; acon...@redhat.com; > > > > > > maicolgabr...@hotmail.com; ruifeng.w...@arm.com > > > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] build: port arm32 > > > > > > options from make to meson > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 11:03 +0200, Juraj Linkeš wrote: > > > > > > > config/defconfig_arm-armv7a-linux-gcc contains a number of > > > > > > > CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ options. Implement those in applicable > > > > > > > meson.build files. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech> > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > drivers/net/ark/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/avp/meson.build | 5 +++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/cxgbe/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/e1000/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/enic/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/fm10k/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/hinic/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/i40e/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/ionic/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/ixgbe/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/qede/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > drivers/net/vmxnet3/meson.build | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > lib/librte_vhost/meson.build | 2 +- > > > > > > > 13 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > This is disabling a lot of drivers that are building just fine > > > > > > on > > > > > > armv7 at the moment, and thus it is a backward-incomaptible > change. > > > > > > > > > > > > Eg: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/armhf/librte-pmd-cxgbe20.0/fil > > > > > > el > > > > > > ist > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > > > > > > > > > > I guess that means config/defconfig_arm-armv7a-linux-gcc is > > > > > outdated? I've > > > > tried to build all of the drivers and they build except for ixgbe. > > > > Seeing as > > > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/armhf/libs/librte-pmd-ixgbe20.0 > > > > exists, would disabling ixgbe be also a backwards incompatible change? > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Juraj > > > > > > > > Yes. That defconfig is specific to the deprecated GNU Make build > > > > system, which I haven't used in a long time. I do not know if > > > > anybody keeps it > > updated. > > > > > > > > What is the issue you are seeing with ixgbe? > > > > > > There are a lot of issues, please have a look here: > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/jlinkes/dpdk/jobs/319965296#L1932 > > > > > > Juraj > > > > Given it worked fine in 19.11, I'd say they are either regressions or > > issues in the travis setup itself. > > I'd wager it's because of > https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/41b059a20215284e8aa618d2ce1e2a > 803e64c1d0#diff-f44e12b03243963c21a46a37392568db > > When I don't build with ixgbe_rxtx_vec_neon.c it builds fine, indicating real > problems with the code. > > Ruifeng, would you please take a look at the failures here? https://travis- > ci.com/github/jlinkes/dpdk/jobs/319965296#L1932 > Yes. I see couple of problems with ixgbe_rxtx_vec_neon.c when building for AArch32. I will submit patches to fix these.
Thanks. /Ruifeng > Juraj
