16/04/2020 16:02, Medvedkin, Vladimir: > Hi Thomas, > > On 16/04/2020 10:39, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 15/04/2020 20:17, Vladimir Medvedkin: > >> Currently DPDK has a special implementation of a hash table for > >> 4 byte keys which is called FBK hash. Unfortunately its main drawback > >> is that it only supports 2 byte values. > >> The new implementation called K32V64 hash > >> supports 4 byte keys and 8 byte associated values, > >> which is enough to store a pointer. > >> > >> It would also be nice to get feedback on whether to leave the old FBK > >> and new k32v64 implementations or deprecate the old one? > >> > >> v3: > >> - added bulk lookup > >> - avx512 key comparizon is removed from .h > >> > >> v2: > >> - renamed from rte_dwk to rte_k32v64 as was suggested > >> - reworked lookup function, added inlined subroutines > >> - added avx512 key comparizon routine > >> - added documentation > >> - added statistic counters for total entries and extended entries(linked > >> list) > > Please use --in-reply-to so we can follow version changes > > in the same email thread. > > Also I am changing the states in patchwork as superseded. > > Please remind updating status of old patches. > > > > Hmm, strange, I used --in-reply-to. Also in patchwork I can see > > In-Reply-To: <cover.1586369591.git.vladimir.medved...@intel.com>
Indeed, sorry my bad. I can see correct threading: http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/26233198-907c-cf1c-f5ef-154d54c2e...@intel.com/
